Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does the bar labelled "One six note phrase" conform to notation standards?

Triplet notations

All the examples of triplets that I've seen before have always had the beams break every three notes, similar to the "Manual Beaming" bar (although usually with just a 3 over each triplet as inthis question)

Having just a "3" over the six notes seems unusual, but I don't have any notation reference that directly addresses this case.

share|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

The one six note phrase is correct, but instead of putting a 3 over the phrase you would put 6 because you are playing 6 notes instead of 8(just like on a standard triplet you play 3 notes instead of 2).

This site shows a few good examples of grouped 16th note triples in examples 2, 6 - 9 with example 2 shown below.

enter image description here

The idea is you want to keep the standard beaming the same so in 4/4 every count should be group separately and since two sets of sixteenth note triplets make up one beat. Since typically there are 8 sixteenth notes to a quarter note, but you are using 6 in the same space the 6 helps show that the 6 sixteenth notes go where 8 typically go.

share|improve this answer
Whether a "6" is correct would in my mind be a function of whether the triplet sixteenths should be perceived as subdivisions of a quarter note, a duple eighth, or a triplet eighth. Only in the former situation would I favor a "6". In the second, I'd favor two separately-marked triplets, possibly joined via single beam. In the third, I'd favor a single beam grouping all six notes, with double beams connecting pairs, and a single "3" over the whole thing. – supercat Nov 13 '13 at 17:50

Note the distinction between a sextuplet (an irregular grouping of six notes) and the corresponding pair of triplets. At least conceptually these are two different things. But if you could actually hear a difference from a performance is another matter (what you could do is to make small accents on the first, third and fifth notes in the sextuplet and thereby stress a grouping of 3x2 notes instead of 2x3).

Note also that modern music notation software usually are very flexible and that some tuplets that are possible to produce may be more or less confusion to read or perform.

In your three examples the first is unproblematic; the second is confusing, because it looks like a sextuplet but you have a '3' instead of a '6'; the same is also true for the third example (but here you have made clear that the grouping should equal to a pair of triplets).

share|improve this answer
Whether something would be perceived as a sextuplet, a 3x2 group, and a 2x3 group, would likely depend upon context. If it appeared in the middle of a bunch of triplet eighths, it would be perceived as three pairs of notes. If in a bunch of duple eighths, as two groups of three. If in a bunch of quarter notes, as a sextuplet. – supercat Nov 13 '13 at 18:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.