Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am considering to learn/practice Liszt S.566 Schumann Widmung and Franz Liszt Liebestraum No. 3. I have strong interests but simply as an amateur. I can play several pieces of Schumann.

Question: Liszt S.566 Schumann Widmung and Franz Liszt Liebestraum No. 3, which one are easier to start with? Which require less difficulties? (My hands are large and fingers are long - abnormal size, so long-stretching is no a problem with practicing.)

Thank you!

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by NReilingh Jan 22 '14 at 5:36

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Particularly the "best version on YouTube" part is off-topic here, but the first question essentially boils down to "which one is easier?", which is highly subjective. Perhaps you could do some of your own research on the two pieces and then ask a question based on the difficulties you encounter? – NReilingh Jan 22 '14 at 5:38
adjust. It is fine to give simple answers like which one is the easier one to start. Unless there are really no differences. For example, Richard Clayderman are easier than Rachmaninoff's piano concertos. I thought this statement is NOT opinion based. – Idear Jan 22 '14 at 5:44
Or if you can teach me different opinions here and why. Thanks. I am looking for experts(concert pianists) advice. – Idear Jan 22 '14 at 5:44
I had removed this version statement: "Question2: what are the recommended "canonical" versions of these two musics? Such as Yundi Li, E Kissin, Lang Lang, Arthur Rubinstein". – Idear Jan 22 '14 at 5:50
Honestly feel the judgment done by NReilingh is rather partial and biased. See my concern here. In other stackexchange sites, such as Physics, to put on hold, it requires to gather 5 people opinion at least. A single person decision to put on hold is subjective to NReilingh. This in a sense is like monopoly, and the big brother playing in George Orwell's 1984. – Idear Jan 22 '14 at 20:59