Take the 2-minute tour ×
Musical Practice & Performance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

So I was thinking, similar to sharps and flat notes, interval usage is contextual. In the same way that Bb is the same as A#, a diminished fifth is the same as an augmented forth etc. I understand when you would use flats or sharps but I am a little more confused on intervallic values.

I understand how they would work in a scale: if the note is the fifth degree of the scale and a tritone above the route then you would clearly refer to it as a diminished fifth rather than an augmented forth but what happens when there is no scale to base the intervals upon? Does it even matter?

Thanks for your time

share|improve this question
    
As the two other answers have indicated, its all about context.So when you have an interval and no context then there is no single correct answer. So you right, in this case it doesn't matter. –  Simon Rigby Mar 2 at 23:01

2 Answers 2

Letter names.Count from whatever letter is underneath.This is why there are two or three different names for the same sounding interval.Where the notes are written on a stave will dictate the naming.So, I suppose you could say that the bottom note of an interval can be regarded as the root note of its scale, and the upper note will be determined from that standpoint.It's theory that tries to explain what is happening.Rules are made, and then have to be adhered to as best as possible. Just playing two notes and asking what the interval is will never work, as much as hearing a note D#/Eb, and being able to say which it is. (equal !)You need to know parameters like what key are we in.

share|improve this answer

I usually think of it contextually, and try to make my choices based on the harmony I want to imply.

In a C diminished chord, you'd call the note at the diminished fifth Gb because it's derived that way—a diminished triad is two major thirds, which add up to a diminished fifth, and that's that.

On the other hand, a Cmaj7#11 chord comes by that same interval a different way. It's derived from the Lydian mode, in which the fourth is augmented. So, in that case, I'd call the note F#.

In the same sort of vein, I could indicate a dominant chord as G7b5, or G7#11. Identical, at first glance, but when I use the 7b5 notation, I'm asking for a whole tone sound or perhaps an altered scale sound (though my preference is to notate that G7alt instead), whereas when I use the 7#11 notation, I'm asking instead for a Lydian Dominant sort of sound. The choice really depends on the parent scale of the chord and the function of that interval in the chord.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.