Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I play the violin, and have always tuned using a smartphone app. Today I came across this specialised (to a certain extent) electronic tuner, which got me wondering: How reliable are smartphone tuner apps, in the sense that why should I spend the money on a specialised tuner when an app seems to work just fine?

share|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

I've compared my fancy Korg multi-temperament orchestra tuner to various tuner apps available for Android on my Nexus 4, and I prefer the box every time. It's got much better sound detection, and because it's a fancy (and expensive) one there's no issue with support for reference pitches and temperaments (although all I regularly need is A440, A415, equal temperament and Vallotti's temperament). However, I suspect if my phone had a better microphone the apps could be just as good and they're certainly fully capable of producing what seem to be accurate reference tones to tune that way.

So really it's down to your experience, your phone hardware and if you've already invested in a tuning box with the capabilities you need. If you've already got a smartphone and its microphone is up to the task, an app is going to be a lot cheaper - provided you keep it charged, anyway!

share|improve this answer

I personally experienced no difference. If the app is able to pick up your violin's sound, its frequency display will have roughly the same precision as a tuner, tuner/metronome combination.

Advantages of an app:

  • always at hand
  • often more flexible (tuning frequency, display variations)

Advantages of a device:

  • may be more intuitive to use
  • no hesitation to hand over to fellow musicians
  • cheaper to replace if dropped to the floor and crashed
  • unshared power source, so better chances to be still sufficient (kudos to Matthew for that)

My favourite Android (newly available for iOS also) app is PitchLab, but your mileage may vary.

share|improve this answer
If you want to tune things like electric guitars that can be plugged in somewhere, it is often an advantage to be able to plug it into your tuner device. – PlasmaHH May 9 '14 at 15:39

One advantage of a dedicated clip-on tuner is that it can detect vibrations coming through the body of the instrument. A smartphone app uses a microphone that hears not just the instrument, but also lots of other ambient noise. The clip-on tuner can use the cleaner signal coming directly through the instrument, and so may be less prone to responding to ambient noise or may be effective in a noisy environment in which a smart phone app would not be able to cope.

share|improve this answer

The microphone of the smartphone is optimized for speech, not for music. Its supported frequency range is the vocal range of the average human talker, not a professional singer. As narrow as 300 Hz to 3500 Hz only was declared "optimal" in the past, while now it may be wider. Hence the microphone may not be picking very low or high frequences well enough.

From the other side, if the instrument is loud enough or its not an 8 octave piano after all, this still may work. As long as the sound is picked, the frequency indicator should be reliable. It is at the end backed up by the internal quartz oscillator of the device.

However there are many possible bugs and design flaws that would make a tuner app inaccurate or not working at all. Simply counting ups and downs per second may result inaccurate reading due distortions and background noises. But if a good program can be written for a tuner, such a program will probably run on a smartphone also.

As a result, you probably need to try multiple applications and do not rely blindly on them. If the familiar melody seems sounding out of tune, it probably is, even if the smartphone tuner suggest otherwise!

share|improve this answer
@jon2512chua They don’t have to. – Édouard May 9 '14 at 7:50
It's not required to explain why you choose to downvote something. Although it is of course often helpful to do so. – Matthew Walton May 9 '14 at 9:52
If you explain properly, I will fix or revoke the answer. Otherwise I get -2 points for your downvote yet you get -1. – h22 May 9 '14 at 11:32
I did not downvote this answer, but there is a lot of speculation of possible error sources, rather than experience from these apps, which could be a reason for downvote. Judging from some videos recorded with phones, frequency range can be quite complete. – Meaningful Username May 9 '14 at 11:45
I'm with Jon, great answer Audrius. I used a smartphone tuner on a 5 octave harpsichord, because my dedicated tuner was having major issues for some reason. It worked for my guitar but not for my harpsichord. However, the smartphone tuner worked like a charm. – MrTheBard May 9 '14 at 16:07

Smartphone tuner apps are pretty solid. I have a specialized tuner that is 3-4 years old that has been having a hard time picking up acoustic sounds as of lately. I bought a smartphone tuner app to tune my harpsichord and it worked like a charm.

I have experience with Cleartune for Android. There are benefits to having a dedicated tuner. For instance, if the instrument that you're tuning is electric, or acoustic-electric, you can plug it in to some tuners and tune it even if there is noise in your vicinity. With the smartphone tuner, any additional background noise may get picked up and make it harder for you to tune your instrument.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.