Take the 2-minute tour ×
Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am going to record music with the guitar and bass guitar. However, I am still undecided between using an amp with microphone, and an amp simulator. Which of the two would be a better choice when sound quality is concerned?

share|improve this question
1  
A title is not a Question. Please explain what you want to acheive –  david strachan Jul 10 at 9:21
    
QUALITY difference between record an instrument from a Condensator Microphone and connect instrument dry signal to audio interface and then emulate amplifiers and effects? –  kamauz Jul 10 at 9:23
    
You need put more details in this question, as it currently is quite unclear what you are after. –  Meaningful Username Jul 10 at 9:27

3 Answers 3

up vote 7 down vote accepted

When using an amp with microphone, it means that you play the guitar through a physical amp, and using a microphone to direct this sound into your recording system.

An amp simulator is software that literally simulates an amp; you plug your guitar into your computer (through an interface for better quality), and this sound is modified by the software that you use.

Quality-wise, you can't just say that one is better than the other, so I will try to give you a list of common advantages to each option.

Advantages of using an amp with microphone:

  • More possibilities & flexibility. The room's acoustics, the microphone's characteristics, the microphone's position,... there are numerous things that affect your sound, and that you can play around with to use your own unique sound. Once you get a hang of this, it can become vital in your recordings.
  • More natural sound. Since you're recording analogous sound, in a natural environment with acoustic characteristics, your sound will be more natural. It is a subtle thing, but something everybody's ear is able to pick up.
  • No latency. Software simply needs time to do whatever it's doing. An amp simulator may have a delay of just a few hundredths of a second, but that's already audible! When recording, there is the option to nullify this delay, but this will not work when you're simply rehearsing.

(Note: the first two points are definitely up to debate, as high quality amp simulators will allow you to closely imitate these possibilities as well.)

Advantages of using an amp simulator:

  • Other possibilities. When using software, you are usually not limited to the abilities that you have at hand. Many simulators allow for plugins to be installed, which can alter your sound completely. The same thing can be done with a regular amp of course, but then you'll have to run to your nearby music store with a hundred bucks each time. ;-)
  • Cleaner sound. When recording through a microphone, there is always the issue of unwanted background noise. Even if you're sitting in a professional studio, a microphone may be able to pick up your breathing and the rustling of your clothes. With an amp simulator, you will not have this issue.
share|improve this answer
1  
Another advantage of amp simulators is consistency - you don't need to worry about getting the right mic in the right place to get the tone you're looking for, don't need to adjust so much for different venues, etc. –  jonrsharpe Jul 10 at 9:46
2  
An amp simulator can be used at low volume or with headphones and so can be used without disturbing those around you. Not always possible when micing a live amp. –  Paulski73 Jul 10 at 12:52
1  
@LeeWhite I think your first point in advantages for amp and mic are misleading and maybe incorrect. Amp simulators will let you control the room's acoustics, microphone's characteristics, position, etc. If anything, this is a point in favor of sims, making sims more flexible in that regard (unless you happen to have 100 amps, mics and mic types, and rooms sitting in your studio). –  JCPedroza Jul 10 at 16:11
2  
@LeeWhite Quality of the tone equates well with the quality of the gear. For instance: A vintage 1965 Fender Super Reverb (not reissue) with a NOS Mullard GZ34 rectifier, matched NOS Genalex KT66 power tubes correctly biased, Vintage NOS preamp tubes e.g. RCA/Telefunken/GE, 4 P10Q WeberVST speakers, mic'ed with a Shure SM57 will kill anything Line6 or any simulation box can ever simulate. This is not unlike trying to compare a Hot Wheels version of a Corvette to the real thing. However, a crappy amp and crappy mic, will be trumped by a decent simulator configured properly. –  filzilla Jul 10 at 19:22
2  
"I can tell you no one there would even consider blind test of tube amps vs. simulators, too obvious" well, refusing to do some scientific test on grounds of "too obvious" is often a good sign somebody's just scared to find out they've been wrong. –  leftaroundabout Jul 10 at 22:28

The answer is: It depends.

A good amp connected to a good cab in a good room will sound good through a well placed good mic connected to a good preamp. I don't believe that any amp sim can beat that yet. But that's a lot of variables, many things can go wrong, it's not very hard but certainly not trivial.

To me, a good amp simulator sounds way better than a mediocre amp connected to a mediocre cab in a mediocre room through a mediocre mic placed in a mediocre way connected to a mediocre preamp. And as long as you have a good way to provide a good dry signal to the amp sim, it's also way more consistent and convenient.

Besides, amp sims are constantly improving. The earliest examples were just jokes and I think that's what gave them a bad name. But the latest generation amp sims are almost impossible to tell apart from a real amp when listened to. But they do still feel different when you actually play.

So, choice is yours; if you can, try both ways and listen.

share|improve this answer
    
Worth noting that depending on the details of the amp modeller, the amount of latency involved, particularly for monitoring, might make that approach less desirable. –  Dave Jul 10 at 16:47
    
@Dave Latency can be reduced to the point it is negligible. The problem is not latency, but that people often don't know how to control it. (a high latency setup has its own advantages, which is why latency can be controlled via the buffer size) –  JCPedroza Jul 10 at 21:23

Why not do both? Use a DI unit such as a Radial JDV or similar and run one output into your amp which is mic'd and the other into your audio interface and record the direct dry signal at the same time, then simply add an amp sim plugin and choose a tone to complement your amp tone.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.