Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm learning music theory by myself with online books and video lessons. I don't have much trouble understanding the basics of theory, such as intervals, basic scales and modes, but I have a huge issue with sight reading. I know that sight reading is important, but I find it hard to read notes in a music sheet on an acceptable speed and transpose the notes to my instrument of choice (which is a guitar).

I want to understand the concepts behind music and apply that knowledge to a guitar, but I feel that I may be missing something if I skip sight reading. Should I stop this bad behavior of mine if I want to become a better musician?

Important notes: Music is a hobby for me and I do not plan to play in any kind of band or such. I have a keyboard and I know that it is easier to learn sight reading on an instrument such as piano/keyboard due to how the notes on the instrument are placed, so if I have to change instruments to learn it I am able to do so.

share|improve this question
It's absolutely possible to know a lot of theory and not be able to sight read. Standard music notation is about being a team player, yet obscures theory that is obvious in alternate notations. It is easier to number notes 0..11 in some situations, or to use frequencies and pitch ratios in other situations. Heavy Metal shredders with much scale/chord skill use tablature. It has unambiguous fingering. Microtonal (fretless) musicians are obnoxiously theoretical, and have little use for standard notations. – Rob Aug 22 '14 at 20:46
Yes, it is possible. I did. But that's probably because I play guitar the most, where transposing a song a semitone up is a whole lot easier than on a piano. However, I still can't sight read guitar tabs, although, it is possible. – Cole Johnson Aug 22 '14 at 21:45
They are two different things. sight reading ie the ability to pick up sheet music and play it without preparation - is a separate area of knowledge from music theory. . . which is just that - theory. You can be an expert in music theory without being able to play a note. Personally my theory knowledge is way more than my playing ability - and I so much wish it were the other way round. – peterG Aug 23 '14 at 0:35
Most, if not all, guitarist can't sight read even average songs perfectly the first time. Even my classical guitar instructor, who had a master's degree, had to spend around an hour to master a song with 2 voices. Unrelated, but if you're interested check this out – Gᴇᴏᴍᴇᴛᴇʀ Aug 24 '14 at 0:56
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I would say that since

Music is a hobby for me and I do not plan to play in any kind of band or such

learning to sight read isn't really important. It depends on you. I prefer reading normal music sheets rather than tabs or whatever, but this is just me. If you have time and energy to learn how to sight read,it most certainly won't be wasted.

but I find it hard to read notes in a music sheet on an acceptable speed and transpose the notes to my instrument of choice

This just takes practice. You need to practice sight reading in order to be able to sight read a piece and play it at the same time. It doesn't happen overnight. So, just keep practicing if you want to have satisfactory results.

I, personally, don't think that you would miss out on music theory if you don't sight read. You would miss out on music theory if you don't understand what you are playing on your guitar.

Let's say that for instance you play the 3rd fret on the E string and then the 2nd fret on the A string. If you know that these notes are G and B respectively, (and since you know about intervals -- thus you know that this is a major 3rd) you won't be missing out, no matter if you sight read them or read a tab.

it is easier to learn sight reading on an instrument such as piano/keyboard

I wouldn't say that this is necessarily true. Every instrument takes some practice to play while sight reading. Some instruments (like the ones you mentioned) might actually be a bit easier, but that doesn't make an instrument like the guitar that much harder to learn to sight read.

share|improve this answer

It is important to be able to read music to some extent. But the ability to sight read, which means to be able to pick up the music and just play it, is not all that essential. I can sight read a single vocal line, but in theory classes, we used complex scores that there was no way I could ever sight read them.

In fact, sight reading was part of a different class, called ear training. And that class was pretty much everyone's worst class. Yet all of them were not only good enough with theory to pass, but also actually played written music in concert. They just learned the music slowly over time.

So, no, I would say that sight reading is not all that important for learning music theory. What's important is that you know what the notes mean. Sight reading is a skill that can open up possibilities for playing your instrument, but it has little to do with actually understanding how music works.

share|improve this answer
"but it has little to do with actually understanding how music works" That was exactly my doubt. I was concerned if I would not be able to understand how music works in theory if my sight reading is undeveloped. – TonySniper Aug 22 '14 at 19:28
@TonySniper Just note that I don't mean that you don't need to know how to read music. That's a different skill, and it's pretty important. But reading and playing are different things. – trlkly Aug 22 '14 at 19:31
I understand that. I am able to read simple music sheets, but as I said, my problem is that I read them slowly and that I have trouble playing what I read. I'm working on my reading skills nonetheless, hehe. – TonySniper Aug 22 '14 at 19:33

Sight reading is an extremely rare skill which is mostly used by high level performers auditioning a piece they have never seen for a part in a musical or band. For nearly all other players, it is unrealistic to attempt to play a piece you cannot easily sing or with which you are unfamiliar. The main value of reading music is NOT to play it the first time (or even the 10th time) you see it. The value of the written music is to help you get the feel of it, and to be used as a reference, not as an exact procedure. Music doesn't come from what is written. Instead, it comes from the feeling of it, the rhythm, the flow. Notation usually gets in the way of listening and letting it flow. Don't get trapped by the written music. Play it from your feeling, and let your ear guide you. Thanks, Mark Tennenhouse

share|improve this answer

I would actually say that the opposite is true, namely, that study of music theory is what matters, and that even if you don't practice sight reading (though you probably should), it's the study of theory that will make the biggest improvement in your sight reading compared to anything else.

Sight reading is a tricky thing to do, there is quite a lot of information, and unlike the arabic letters of the alphabet, there is very little in the way of unique characteristic that helps to differentiate between notes of a different pitch.

Rhythm is actually far easier to read because there is far more that characteristically distinguishes each individual note, namely the stems, flags and fill of the circle.

The primary functions one must understand when reading music relate to theory, namely the key signature in which the piece is written and intended. When one observes which sharps and flats the key signature has, this illuminates almost immediately which notes are viable and which notes are not. In other words, the key signature eliminates a lot of possibilities and potential confusion because, to sound correct, there is only now a limited subset of notes to choose from, e.g. only the notes in an Eb scale perhaps, which means that you know several black notes and several white notes are out of the question.

This then means that one may focus less on the absolute note names and positions of each note on the staff, and may then refer to the relative distances between successive notes, combined with the scale which is being used, to determine which notes the music is probably referring to.

I for one, personally, have been almost always horrible at sight reading, but over the years of e.g. reading chord charts on both guitar and piano, and over the years of haphazardly attempting to solo, in an improvisational manner over chord changes, I have found that my sight reading ability has actually dramatically increased with pretty much no actual practice in actually spending time reading standard written musical staff based notation. This is because I have studied each of the 12 keys so in depth, and have learned so many songs, and have practiced my circle of 4ths, 5ths, 3rds, half steps, whole steps etc, that I just have a familiarity with each key and the territory and relationships across which music most often progresses.

This means that when I try to read music, so much of it is so much more immediately obvious to me that I don't need to actually "read" every single individual note, and this ability to read without reading is something most good teachers I've had have confirmed as being the general appropriate way to read music.

So, you really probably should practice reading music in its own right, but realize too, that study of theory and composition, of key and of modulation, are critically important to actually increasing your ability to read music as you practice that skill.

share|improve this answer

Whilst agreeing with most of Shev's answer, I feel that sight reading is a lot more straightforward on a keyboard type instrument.For each note on the stave, there is only one place to play it. Thus it makes more sense, and the 'geography' of a melody is simpler to translate onto the keys. With a guitar, there are sevceral different places to play the same note, so it can confuse quite easily. There would be no need to use anything but the treble clef initially on keys, but if you're into theory, then the bass clef would start to make sense with keys, not guitar. (Unless you're on bass!)

If you do go for guitar, the accompanying tab may or may not help. It's usually one person's idea of where the notes get played. It's not usually the only place, though, and this in itself may mess up your learning process.

Being able to read will only be an advantage to you, so go for it - it'll also put some of that theory into practice, with timing, etc.

share|improve this answer

I feel that I may be missing something if I skip sight reading

I think so. Understanding (and being confortable with) traditional music notation is very useful, and specially in combination with the understanding of the theory (scales, chords, etc). For example, you can detect at first sight the tonality of a piece, and spot quickly the chromatic notes, etc. Not only that, but most classical guitar works and study books are writen in that way. Furthermore, it's much detailed (well specified) notation than a tab (you can play a piece without having ever heard it). And, even more: you can even read some music sheet for other instrument (eg, piano) and sight-play it almost instantaneously on your guitar (even with trasposition, just by mentally moving the notes up or down visually, in the staves). I play classical guitar, I'm totally amateur, (you can check my profile) and I value all this inmensely.

share|improve this answer

Learning music theory without sight reading is like learning poetry without reading. Sight reading is not essential to music theory, but scores are the written language in which the music theory has been laid down.

Now with a guitar, "sight reading" mostly describes a reproductive skill, like being able to recite a text you did not know before. It is not necessary to read out loud in order to understand a text. In a similar way, it is not necessary to actually play some material in order to understand underlying music theory.

Playing from tablature is sort of like reading from a phonetic transcription: you only get what is necessary for basic mechanical reproduction (and it may work even in languages you don't know), but the underlying structure and sense is harder to see and that may reflect the quality of the reproduction.

So being able to work with scores tends to give you more of a story about the music (including more theoretic stuff like voicing and leading) than working with tablature.

With regard to music theory, sightreading skills just are a skill making scores more familiar, and those are the language that music theory employs for pinning down things.

It's like knowing physics when doing math. Just a different threshold of entry and a different level of preexisting basic familiarity. But not the same story quite.

share|improve this answer

Yes - I compose orchestral music as a hobby, but I don't play any instruments. So, yes, technically you can learn theory without knowing how to sight read

share|improve this answer

There's only one way you can learn theory without knowing how to read music: a teacher explains and shows you. So you can get this either with in-person lesson (teacher sitting next to you) or online video lesson. That's it.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.