Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

enter image description here

The bottom line is what I'm talking about. They're interleaved and I'm playing it on one piano (though it's written for two). I've been doing 2/3 in each hand, with the left hand over the right, near the top of the keys. I feel like a T-rex playing it. Any other ideas?

share|improve this question
    
I don't see the problem? There's only one staff for one piano, so it should be playable. – Raskolnikov Jun 20 '12 at 12:03
2  
@Raskolnikov I don't see how "one staff for one piano" is a good justification for whether it's playable. You could (potentially) cram a bunch of stuff onto one staff (see Fairies Aire and Death Waltz =P). Also, ash mentions in the question that it's written for two pianos. – jadarnel27 Jun 20 '12 at 12:41
2  
+1 for "I feel like a T-rex playing it" – Widor Jun 20 '12 at 13:58
    
@Jadarnel: but I only see the part for one of the pianos. So, I still don't see the problem. If he also wants to play what the other piano does, maybe he should put the score for the second piano too. – Raskolnikov Jun 20 '12 at 15:37
1  
Actually, I just checked on the Goldberg variations. There are no two pianos. There's just one clavichord, but the clavichord for the 23rd variation has two manuals (i.e. keyboards). Still, the particular passage ash is referring to should be doable on an ordinary piano. – Raskolnikov Jun 20 '12 at 15:39
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think you have effectively answered your own question.

I think if it is playable, it doesn't matter if you look like a T-Rex, as your alternative is to shift one part up or down an octave - which will change the flavour. Could be worth a try though - might sound interesting.

share|improve this answer
1  
Gasp! Moving octaves! You blaspheme! – ash Jun 21 '12 at 0:13
    
Have to downvote, sorry--the Goldberg variations were written for a solo clavichord with two manuals. If OP's post was a two-piano arrangement, there would be two grand staffs. – NReilingh Jun 21 '12 at 0:25
    
Ooo - good point @NReilingh. I just took the OP's post at face value and didn't really think about the staffs. – Dr Mayhem Jun 21 '12 at 7:54

For me this isn't terribly difficult. Play the lower staff with the left hand, the upper staff with the right. I use 2 and 4 in each hand since they are more even in length. However, I might change that to take the F# in the left hand with 3.

Play right hand over left, not left over right. It's harder to hit the G# in the right hand when reaching under than it is to hit the F# in the left reaching under. (Try it for yourself.) Play the right hand white keys up towards the fallboard, putting your fingers between black keys. Play the left hand out towards the edge of the keyboard, reaching in slightly to take the F#.

See how that works for you. :)

share|improve this answer

why so many answers say clavichord? this was originally intended for harpischord, where you might (or might not) have had two manuals (keyboards). of course, it can be played on organ, clavichord, and piano, but easily works on one keyboard.

It's a bit awkward. You have to plan out the choreography, but it really isn't terribly difficult. One hand plays nearer the fallboard, the other farther out on the keys... maybe some creative use of long fingers (2-4) in places... hand underneath has a low wrist and the top hand reaches over. relax... watch for tension.. figure out which hand is on top (right) and just work it out so you always play it the same each time.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.