Take the 2-minute tour ×
Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Axis of Awesome has a song called "4 Chords", a medley of various songs all written, or so it's claimed, using the same four chords.

Now, from what I understand, a chord is just a bunch of tones played at the same time so they sound like one. For example, a 300 Hz note and a 500 Hz note played simultaneously will be a 100 Hz sound (because 100 is the greatest common factor of 300 and 500) with a lot of nuance in it, and that's called a chord. So the songs in the medley all have the same chords, that is, the same sounds with the same… what I called nuances.

They don't.

Never mind the lyrics: there are clearly more than four sounds in any of the songs when sung: just listen to 'em. But even watching the keyboardist's hands on the electronic keyboard (for the one segment where you get to do so for any significant length of time (warning, foul language in that clip)), you can see he hits more than four chords.

What gives? Am I hearing and seeing wrong, or is my definition of chord wrong, or is Axis of Awesome lying, or is there some explanation of how the songs in this medley are considered to have but four chords even though they have more?

share|improve this question
2  
I wrote an answer you might find helpful to another question about harmony; it explains how chords can be classified by number: music.stackexchange.com/a/2292/36 –  Alex Basson Nov 29 '12 at 12:54

3 Answers 3

Well, I don't know about all this hertz stuff, that's never interested me as a musician. A chord is a harmony that is created with a SET of usually three or four different notes (tones) that are not repeated. It does not matter which order you play them as long as they are played simulataneously.

Now sometimes a band will have a song that is based on a three or four chords - these are the underlying changes - but often the musicians take liberty with this and insert additional chords, substitute chords, and so forth, so in fact they are not playing "just four chords." The guitarist or pianist might be playing more. It just depends.

share|improve this answer
    
What does this add to the preexisting answers and comments thereon? –  msh210 Dec 11 '12 at 22:50

The chords are I, IV, V, and vi (not in that order) which together contain every note in the key. So any extra notes could be considered to be part of one of those chords. Regardless though the idea is not that the keyboardist plays only a specific set of notes. It's that four chords (in the broader sense Dr Mayhem mentions, which includes inversions and so on) are the basis for the songs, forming the major progression and sound. Other chords (if any) serve only to transition to one of the 4 main chords. And of course this is only true for the portion of the song being played — they never get to the part of Don't Start Believing that uses a iii chord!

None of those song snippets could be played recognizably without one of those 4 chords. But they could all be played without any other chords and be recognizable.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks; +1; that makes a lot of sense to me (except the second sentence). –  msh210 Nov 27 '12 at 22:37
    
(And considering how many possible sets of notes could be played simultaneously and sound good, I'm surprised they're numbered. What do the numbers go to, the thousands? But I suppose that's another question....) –  msh210 Nov 27 '12 at 22:40
    
@msh210 There are 7 notes in every Major/minor key. Capital-numeral (e.g., IV) denotes the Major chord starting on the numbered note, and lowercase-numeral (e.g., iii) denotes the minor chord starting on the numbered note. As for the second setence -- every note in the key is used by at least 1 of the 4 chords, meaning that any note you play in the key could be considered to be functioning as part as one of those 4 chords rather than independently or as part of a different chord. –  Matthew Read Nov 27 '12 at 23:20
    
Okay, so the chord comprising, say, middle C, the note a third higher, and the C two octaves lower has no number? And: Why would you consider a note part of a chord when it's played alone? (Or did you mean it's part of an arpeggiated chord, played alone but in very close proximity to other notes?) –  msh210 Nov 27 '12 at 23:49
    
@msh210 In the key of C Major, any combination of any C's, E's, and G's could be considered a I chord. (Similarly any such combination would be a V chord in F Major, and so on.) Most commonly you'll have one of each note very close together, but it's not necessary. And yes I'd most likely consider it part of an arpeggiated chord, but it's important to note that notes can be left out without making it "not a chord". This general sense of "chord" we're using is limited to specific notes, but not specific combinations or positions of said notes. –  Matthew Read Nov 27 '12 at 23:58

tl;dr - your definition of chord is wrong.

Your initial assumption

a 300 Hz note and a 500 Hz note played simultaneously will be a 100 Hz sound

is unfortunately incorrect.

When you play a 300Hz note and a 500Hz note what you will get is a 300Hz note, and a 500Hz note, and a 200Hz note (the difference between them) and an 800Hz note (the sum of the two frequencies) (Have a listen to the demos on this page for examples)

In addition to that, a chord can have any number of notes in it (typically on a piano it usually has 10 or less notes, and on a guitar you're usually expecting 6 or less)

And finally, a chord can be played in many different ways, so if I wanted to I could play a 4 chord song using 20 different variations of that chord.

Update After watching the actual video, the keyboard player is only playing 4 chords, and not really playing any variations of them. He is sometimes accenting certain notes more than the others, but the 4 chord shapes he is using are consistent throughout that segment. He is hitting and releasing keys, sure, but only as parts of the same chords.

share|improve this answer
    
My point was that you can see many different sets of notes being played on the keyboard in the video, and hear many different sounds sung, in a supposedly four-chord song. I thank you for your correction to my definition of chord, but I don't see how that correction addresses my question. Your last sentence, "a chord can be played in many different ways, so if I wanted to I could play a 4 chord song using 20 different variations of that chord" looks like it may be an attempt to answer my question — if you'd explain how that works, and that it's done in the medley "4 Chords". –  msh210 Nov 27 '12 at 19:31
    
Updated for you @msh210 –  Dr Mayhem Nov 27 '12 at 19:40
    
Hitting middle C and the E above it and the G above that simultaneously is playing one chord; then hitting middle C and the E above it and the A above that is playing another chord. Right? (Again, you haven't explained your "a chord can be played in many different ways, so if I wanted to I could play a 4 chord song using 20 different variations of that chord".) In that case, [cont'd] –  msh210 Nov 27 '12 at 22:35
    
[cont'd] In that case, "hitting and releasing keys, sure, but only as parts of the same chords" makes no sense to me. The keyboardist was playing different sets of keys. Note WP's "A chord in music is any harmonic set of two or more notes that is heard as if sounding simultaneously". –  msh210 Nov 27 '12 at 22:35
    
If you play a CEG chord, there are lots of C's, E's and G's on a keyboard. Playing any of them together can be thought of as the same chord (just a different inversion) –  Dr Mayhem Nov 28 '12 at 9:06

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.