Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to transcribe a pop song.

I'm fairly sure that the time signature is 2/4 since it has a ONE two ONE two, feel like a march.

My problem is that it's a fast song and contains so many 32th notes that it's difficult to read.

Is there any equivalency to 2/4 that I can use to make the score easier to read?

share|improve this question
If it's a pop song it's likely in 4/4 since basically every pop song ever is in 4/4 but I guess one could argue that 2/4 is almost the same thing. Regardless, nonpop's answer is correct but the same thing is achieved by writing in 2/2, switching it to 2/4, and then saying the tempo is twice as fast. I don't see any reason it couldn't be moved to 4/4 either. The time signature is a matter of convenience, literally any of them could be used. – Tony Jan 28 '13 at 19:10
Yes. ONE two ONE two in a pop song is 4/4. The primary thing you can do to make a score easier to read is put it in common time, unless it simply cannot be written in common time. – Simon White Feb 4 at 18:07
up vote 12 down vote accepted

How about 2/2 (alla breve)? This also goes in two, but the pulse is a half-note so you can write your 32nds as 16ths, which should be readable. Nowadays alla breve is also usually associated with a quick tempo so to an experienced musician it should look right.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.