Timeline for Custom rehearsal markings on an arrangement of a piece that already has them
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2021 at 6:59 | vote | accept | KeizerHarm | ||
| Jun 7, 2021 at 6:01 | history | edited | Aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 330 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2021 at 22:00 | comment | added | Aaron | @KeizerHarm I like that idea. Use, say, letters for your own marks and place the original orchestral marks next to them in a smaller font, or parentheses — something to distinguish them. Include a prefatory note in the score to explain, and I think you've got a solid system. | |
| Jun 6, 2021 at 21:58 | comment | added | KeizerHarm | @Aaron thank you for the answer. It is a good point that the original rehearsal marks will be useful when having the orchestral and piano score side-by-side; however I worry that skipping numbers will make the resultant boxed numbers hard to interpret (and they are easy enough to confuse with measurement numbers as is). I could perhaps use the orchestral numbers but in a smaller font, and then my custom marks as a separate set, using the letters of the alphabet? | |
| Jun 6, 2021 at 21:56 | comment | added | KeizerHarm | @PiedPiper I am as amateur as they come: this arrangement will never go anywhere near a publisher :) But if any pianist comes across my work and considers picking it up, I want to make it easy for them to perform. | |
| Jun 6, 2021 at 21:53 | comment | added | PiedPiper | If the arrangement is going to be published, the publisher will have their own ideas about rehearsal marks. | |
| Jun 6, 2021 at 21:49 | history | answered | Aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |