Timeline for Custom dynamic mark
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2022 at 12:45 | comment | added | Elements In Space♦ |
Personally, I when I'm re-engraving a piece I take lots of liberties; "fixing" "mistakes" etc., I would probably move that dynamic mark to over the first note and use the \whiteout command to cross the barline—because that would make more sense, and be much easier to read (for me). However I can definitely understand why you'd prefer to make a more faithful copy.
|
|
| Nov 2, 2022 at 1:56 | comment | added | fourpastmidnight |
Actually, I specifically did not want \whiteout in this case--as the original score looked this way. Also, if I hadn't adjusted used the line (#:with-dimensions...), then the text would've "pushed" the barline over--but again, something I specifically was trying to avoid. But yes, had I not wanted the overlapping barlines (but keeping the measure dimensions the same), \whiteout would've done the trick!
|
|
| Nov 1, 2022 at 1:46 | comment | added | Elements In Space♦ |
In this case you might consider using the \whiteout command.
|
|
| S Oct 25, 2022 at 3:25 | review | First answers | |||
| Oct 25, 2022 at 3:58 | |||||
| S Oct 25, 2022 at 3:25 | history | answered | fourpastmidnight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |