I've started learning music theory and have a question:

Assuming I have a crotchet pulse with triple meter.

Beat1, Beat2, Beat3| Beat1, Beat2, Beat3|...

The accent is always on the 1st beat. If I now build a rhythm on it from 1/8 notes, there are 2 quavers per beat. Is the emphasis/accent (bold) for one bar then:

1. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)
2. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)

Like 1 or 2?

So is the accent on the first beat per bar (which includes 2 Quavers) or just the first Quaver of the first beat per bar?

If Beat1 is defined as stressed, then I assume that the notes that belong to this beat (in this case 2 Quavers) are "children's classes" or "subclasses" of that beat and are therefore all stressed, or am I wrong? A beat is a length of time. Not a singular point, so I thought every note placed in the half open time interval [Beat1; Beat2[ belongs to Beat1 and must therefore be stressed if going by the definition.

I think my earlier discussion would be very useful for this question (especially the conversation with u/CharlietheInquirer):

https://www.reddit.com/r/musictheory/comments/10bq3y7/how_would_i_even_play_2_notes_in_one_beat/

I've drawn another example based on the comments, would that be the correct conclusion?

I see that I've created a lot of confusion with my original question, so I have decided to send the author of "How to read Music in 30 Days, English 2022 Ed." a detailed question that should clearly state my concern.

As it contains quite a lot of text and sketches, these are now attached in handwritten form (I hope this doesn't lead to any forum rules being broken):

I've started learning music theory and have a question:

Assuming I have a crotchet pulse with triple meter.

Beat1, Beat2, Beat3| Beat1, Beat2, Beat3|...

The accent is always on the 1st beat. If I now build a rhythm on it from 1/8 notes, there are 2 quavers per beat. Is the emphasis/accent (bold) for one bar then:

1. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)
2. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)

Like 1 or 2?

So is the accent on the first beat per bar (which includes 2 Quavers) or just the first Quaver of the first beat per bar?

If Beat1 is defined as stressed, then I assume that the notes that belong to this beat (in this case 2 Quavers) are "children's classes" or "subclasses" of that beat and are therefore all stressed, or am I wrong? A beat is a length of time. Not a singular point, so I thought every note placed in the half open time interval [Beat1; Beat2[ belongs to Beat1 and must therefore be stressed if going by the definition.

I think my earlier discussion would be very useful for this question (especially the conversation with u/CharlietheInquirer):

https://www.reddit.com/r/musictheory/comments/10bq3y7/how_would_i_even_play_2_notes_in_one_beat/

I've drawn another example based on the comments, would that be the correct conclusion?

I've started learning music theory and have a question:

Assuming I have a crotchet pulse with triple meter.

Beat1, Beat2, Beat3| Beat1, Beat2, Beat3|...

The accent is always on the 1st beat. If I now build a rhythm on it from 1/8 notes, there are 2 quavers per beat. Is the emphasis/accent (bold) for one bar then:

1. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)
2. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)

Like 1 or 2?

So is the accent on the first beat per bar (which includes 2 Quavers) or just the first Quaver of the first beat per bar?

If Beat1 is defined as stressed, then I assume that the notes that belong to this beat (in this case 2 Quavers) are "children's classes" or "subclasses" of that beat and are therefore all stressed, or am I wrong? A beat is a length of time. Not a singular point, so I thought every note placed in the half open time interval [Beat1; Beat2[ belongs to Beat1 and must therefore be stressed if going by the definition.

I think my earlier discussion would be very useful for this question (especially the conversation with u/CharlietheInquirer):

https://www.reddit.com/r/musictheory/comments/10bq3y7/how_would_i_even_play_2_notes_in_one_beat/

I've drawn another example based on the comments, would that be the correct conclusion?

I've started learning music theory and have a question:

Assuming I have a crotchet pulse with triple meter.

Beat1, Beat2, Beat3| Beat1, Beat2, Beat3|...

The accent is always on the 1st beat. If I now build a rhythm on it from 1/8 notes, there are 2 quavers per beat. Is the emphasis/accent (bold) for one bar then:

1. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)
2. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)

Like 1 or 2?

So is the accent on the first beat per bar (which includes 2 Quavers) or just the first Quaver of the first beat per bar?

If Beat1 is defined as stressed, then I assume that the notes that belong to this beat (in this case 2 Quavers) are "children's classes" or "subclasses" of that beat and are therefore all stressed, or am I wrong? A beat is a length of time. Not a singular point, so I thought every note placed in the half open time interval [Beat1; Beat2[ belongs to Beat1 and must therefore be stressed if going by the definition.

I think my earlier discussion would be very useful for this question (especially the conversation with u/CharlietheInquirer):

https://www.reddit.com/r/musictheory/comments/10bq3y7/how_would_i_even_play_2_notes_in_one_beat/

I've started learning music theory and have a question:

Assuming I have a crotchet pulse with triple meter.

Beat1, Beat2, Beat3| Beat1, Beat2, Beat3|...

The accent is always on the 1st beat. If I now build a rhythm on it from 1/8 notes, there are 2 quavers per beat. Is the emphasis/accent (bold) for one bar then:

1. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)
2. Beat1(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat2(Quaver - Quaver) - Beat3(Quaver - Quaver)

Like 1 or 2?

So is the accent on the first beat per bar (which includes 2 Quavers) or just the first Quaver of the first beat per bar?

If Beat1 is defined as stressed, then I assume that the notes that belong to this beat (in this case 2 Quavers) are "children's classes" or "subclasses" of that beat and are therefore all stressed, or am I wrong? A beat is a length of time. Not a singular point, so I thought every note placed in the half open time interval [Beat1; Beat2[ belongs to Beat1 and must therefore be stressed if going by the definition.

I think my earlier discussion would be very useful for this question (especially the conversation with u/CharlietheInquirer):

https://www.reddit.com/r/musictheory/comments/10bq3y7/how_would_i_even_play_2_notes_in_one_beat/

I've drawn another example based on the comments, would that be the correct conclusion?