Timeline for Correct terminology for chord inversions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2020 at 6:09 | history | edited | Aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
closed -> close
|
| Oct 28, 2014 at 17:11 | history | edited | Dom♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 28, 2013 at 16:13 | vote | accept | kurto | ||
| Nov 27, 2013 at 9:48 | comment | added | Tim | Looking at particular chords played on guitar,specifically,although this will apply to any instrument capable of playing 3+ notes simultaneously, and the fact that a 5th note can be dispensed with, I feel this inversion thing can only be addressed when all 3 (of a triad) notes are present, in closed form. Any scattering becomes a red herring. | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 18:59 | answer | added | user1044 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 16:21 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMusic/status/405370841783103490 | ||
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:50 | answer | added | Dom♦ | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:40 | comment | added | kurto | Sorry, my mistake. I think I read it in "A Classical Approach to Jazz Piano", a book by Dominic Alldis. The author describes the triad inversions but always "supports" them with the root in bass. | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:39 | history | edited | kurto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:27 | history | asked | kurto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |