Timeline for Minor subdominant in a major key
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2014 at 1:24 | comment | added | ninemileskid | I don't think there is any modulation at all, my analysis is in A major everywhere. | |
| Jun 22, 2014 at 0:55 | comment | added | Gᴇᴏᴍᴇᴛᴇʀ | So your saying it just modulates to bm? dm is not the subdominant of bm. only D major is the mediant | |
| Jun 21, 2014 at 18:46 | comment | added | ninemileskid | It's certainly a Dm chord. I'm saying if you make the neapolitan substitution instead (Bb instead of Dm), the effect of the passage is further enhanced. Thus I think it's the best interpretation of why the Dm is effective in the first place. | |
| Jun 21, 2014 at 17:38 | comment | added | r lo | I'm hearing the bass play play an F over the Dm chord then E over the E chord. Therefore the transcription is implying the Dm by the bass line. The other thing you have is if you play F# - F - E on the melody to needs to resolve to A. | |
| Jun 21, 2014 at 0:40 | history | edited | ninemileskid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
ii was actually II
|
| Jun 20, 2014 at 23:27 | history | answered | ninemileskid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |