Timeline for Why is the 7th of e.g. GMAJ7 an octave darker than scale degree 3 and 5?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 31, 2018 at 23:07 | history | edited | Laurence | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
Mar 31, 2018 at 22:04 | comment | added | miniHessel | Sorry, I must’ve been having a seizure.... of course. | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 20:18 | comment | added | user39614 | @miniHessel -- that is true of accidentals, but here the F♯ is not an accidental, but part of the key signature. | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 18:28 | comment | added | miniHessel | Isn’t that wrong according to notation rules? I mean at a new bar, the accidentals of a previous bar does not count? | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 18:01 | comment | added | Tim | @user37496 - I know that! I'm asking if Laurence does!!! | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 17:59 | comment | added | Tim | @miniHessel - no. One F# is sufficient to show all Fs are sharp. | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 17:40 | comment | added | miniHessel | @laurence shouldn’t the F have sharp signs in all the bars? | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 17:11 | comment | added | user37496 | @Tim Chord charts like this are often not mean to be shown in open position but moveable and with a labeling for the fret position (unless the nut is specifically shown as a thicker line). There's no label here, but from the context it's obvious they meant it to be a GMaj7 which would have the F# on the 4th string below the 3rd and 5th degrees as described. | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 16:13 | comment | added | Tim | Are you aware of that tab - it's for F#maj7. That's why there's F# low in the chord! | |
Mar 31, 2018 at 13:38 | history | answered | Laurence | CC BY-SA 3.0 |