Timeline for How to improve writing transitions between ideas?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2018 at 20:46 | comment | added | Igneous01 | That's my problem, on the surface it looks like I did exactly as they did, but on playback it sounds horrible. It's almost as if you need a human to make it come alive, because a human has intuitions on how to slow up/down and crescendo in a way that makes it seem whole. If I try to play what I want, it doesn't follow what I've written, so I don't know how to express it. | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMusic/status/1052620300200931329 | ||
| Oct 17, 2018 at 17:11 | answer | added | Richard | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 15:20 | answer | added | cherub | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 15:01 | comment | added | Dekkadeci | @Kilian Foth - Looks like the OP has already "[tried] something similar" and it still "[sticks] in [his/her] ears like a sore thumb". See "Even when analyzing other composers transitions in score, I can clearly see some of the inner workings of how they did this, but when I try to take these ideas for myself, the execution is poor, and the music is at a standstill because of a really jarring piece of material." Emphasize "What's different between your application of the method and the master's?", although it's possible that the OP cannot find any. | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 6:27 | comment | added | Kilian Foth | Take a piece by a respected composer. Observe how they transition between themes. Does it sound good? Can you find any recurring patterns? What if you try something similar? Does it stick in your ears like a sore thumb? What's different between your application of the method and the master's? Can you find patters? Rinse and repeat. | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 4:00 | history | asked | Igneous01 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |