Timeline for Algorithms for music composition
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
32 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 7, 2022 at 21:35 | history | notice added | Dom♦ | Historical significance | |
| S Jun 7, 2022 at 21:35 | history | locked | Dom♦ | ||
| Aug 21, 2021 at 17:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 24, 2021 at 4:02 | |||||
| Aug 21, 2021 at 16:42 | answer | added | Ubuntourist | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 7, 2017 at 11:36 | comment | added | marcellothearcane | Have you come across jukedeck.com? They use AI to create backing tracks, not sure how it works though. | |
| Oct 6, 2017 at 23:38 | answer | added | Ivar | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://music.stackexchange.com/ with https://music.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| S Aug 17, 2015 at 12:42 | history | suggested | Bozho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added details about computoser projects (paper+source)
|
| Aug 17, 2015 at 11:47 | comment | added | Bozho | @coderboy I added details for computoser to your post. It's open-source and I wrote a paper about it | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 11:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 17, 2015 at 12:42 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2015 at 14:33 | comment | added | guidot | The program Ludwig 3 also seems to do something like composition. | |
| Feb 16, 2015 at 11:08 | answer | added | Adam | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 3, 2013 at 0:02 | history | edited | NReilingh |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 24, 2012 at 16:29 | history | edited | coderboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 163 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2012 at 16:01 | history | edited | coderboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 167 characters in body
|
| Nov 12, 2012 at 4:15 | comment | added | Josh Darnell | This is somewhat related, and might be interesting to you: How can I generate nice-sounding random chord progressions? | |
| Nov 10, 2012 at 19:31 | history | edited | coderboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 352 characters in body
|
| Nov 10, 2012 at 14:35 | answer | added | martin rudowski | timeline score: -5 | |
| Nov 10, 2012 at 9:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMusic/status/267204742537687040 | ||
| Nov 9, 2012 at 15:47 | comment | added | coderboy | martin , I have downloaded some books about music theory and I am learning them in my spare time . I also want to gain a deeper understanding of it by using that knowledge to create programs which compose music . It dosent matter if its historical or experimental . | |
| Nov 8, 2012 at 22:47 | comment | added | martin rudowski | my problem with the question is the word "random" it does not define goals , do you want produce historically or experimental music ? scales are just some tools like math they doesn´t do much alone, techniques aren´t musical.. define your goal.... do you want to learn about scales in western music? | |
| Nov 7, 2012 at 15:52 | vote | accept | coderboy | ||
| Nov 5, 2012 at 15:28 | answer | added | mrkva | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 5, 2012 at 8:00 | comment | added | naught101 | Any useful algorithm should be adaptable to different time signatures and scales. Perhaps we could make this a one-algorithm-per-answer community wiki? | |
| Nov 4, 2012 at 19:50 | comment | added | luser droog | You might be able to mitigate the open-endedness somewhat by reducing the vagueness. Show a little more of what you're doing. What are your rhythm signatures? What kind of results are you getting? ... Try different random number generators (particularly the bad ones), and expand the "steps" into randomly selected two- or three- note figures. | |
| Nov 4, 2012 at 19:15 | comment | added | user1044 | I think this should stay open. It's about techniques for composing music, which seems to me to be well within our guidelines for musical practice and performance. | |
| Nov 4, 2012 at 18:06 | answer | added | user1044 | timeline score: 24 | |
| Nov 4, 2012 at 17:55 | answer | added | Stephen Hazel | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 4, 2012 at 14:24 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 10, 2012 at 3:04 | |||||
| Nov 4, 2012 at 14:06 | comment | added | Luke_0 | Well, I'm kind of afraid the question is a little too open-ended. This site works with a Q&A format, as you may know. Because this question is so open-ended, no answer is more right than another. That makes it not that great of a fit for this site's format. However, if you do have any objective questions, feel free to ask! | |
| Nov 4, 2012 at 10:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 4, 2012 at 14:06 | |||||
| Nov 4, 2012 at 10:39 | history | asked | coderboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |