Timeline for How a chord is analyzed as a "chromatic mediant of the V"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 15, 2018 at 0:50 | comment | added | Dekkadeci | @AllanFelipe - I edited my answer just now to make it clearer. In general, I only classify bIII as a chromatic mediant at all if it is tonicized/modulated into or it is not used like a predominant chord. | |
Dec 15, 2018 at 0:47 | history | edited | Dekkadeci | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
Dec 14, 2018 at 23:17 | comment | added | Allan Felipe | By the way, It seems that your comment contradicts your post. If the mediant M appears in A->M->B your post says that you pay attention to B ("M resolves to..." is the important thing) and not A, but the comment says the opposite ("M transitions from..." is the important thing). | |
Dec 14, 2018 at 23:08 | comment | added | Allan Felipe | Your answer is close to the kind of reasoning I expected, but maybe not thorough enough. I made an edit to my post. | |
Dec 10, 2018 at 8:43 | comment | added | Dekkadeci | @Allan Felipe - Not unless it transitions directly from V (e.g. I V bIII). If all it does is resolve immediately to V (e.g. I bIII V), I'd call it a modal borrowing. | |
Dec 9, 2018 at 21:27 | comment | added | Allan Felipe | V and I share the bIII as chromatic mediant. Then I think you'd say that if it resolves immediately to V it would be a "chromatic mediant of the V", is that right? | |
Dec 9, 2018 at 21:18 | history | answered | Dekkadeci | CC BY-SA 4.0 |