Timeline for How do I use an equalizer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019 at 0:03 | vote | accept | Seery | ||
| Oct 7, 2019 at 11:43 | comment | added | modenv | @PeterMortensen Fair enough, but Q is quite unintuitive especially for beginners and that's why I phrase it as "most narrow Q". This phrasing along with the image examples makes it unlikely that it will be misunderstood. | |
| S Oct 6, 2019 at 6:51 | history | suggested | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/15953>).
|
| Oct 4, 2019 at 17:59 | comment | added | Peter Mortensen | Re "most narrow Q" (two instances) and "widen your Q": Don't you mean "most narrow bandwidth (highest Q)" and "widen your bandwidth (lower Q)", respectively? (Ref. Relationship between Q and bandwidth) | |
| Oct 4, 2019 at 17:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 6, 2019 at 6:51 | |||||
| Oct 4, 2019 at 17:52 | comment | added | modenv | @leftaroundabout never had that problem myself but it's certainly good to know that can be an issue, thanks. | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 16:56 | comment | added | leftaroundabout | “Pick the most narrow Q your EQ will allow” – too narrow is usually not good for the finding-step, unless it's something like a static hum you want to remove. A width of ½ to 1 octave is generally good. If you make the peak too narrow, then it'll make a bad ringing sound everywhere, which may actually be what the OP's problem was when trying the sweeping. | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 15:30 | comment | added | Bort | Check out this bad boy: audio-issues.com/music-mixing/… | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 8:37 | history | edited | modenv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Oct 3, 2019 at 6:17 | history | answered | modenv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |