Timeline for What time signatures are best for choir music? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2019 at 13:58 | history | closed |
Richard user45266 Dom♦ |
Opinion-based | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 21:54 | answer | added | Laurence | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 21:36 | comment | added | leftaroundabout | What a silly question. Obviously the best signature for all choir music is actually 37/√π! | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 18:12 | answer | added | Camille Goudeseune | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 15:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 12, 2019 at 13:58 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2019 at 10:28 | comment | added | Tim | Don't think it matters - not to me, as I will translate something written that looks too quick into something half the speed automatically. crotchets suddenly become minims, etc.If it's something that needs sight-singing on the spot, maybe that's what you ask? | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 10:24 | comment | added | Rosie F | @Tim No, in this question I don't mean the speed of conducting. My concern here is with the performers and what they prefer reading, when they get the score of a piece they'll need to learn. | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 10:14 | comment | added | Tim | The question itself doesn't have a lot of bearing. A far greater influence would be the speed of conducting - which is possibly what you meant? And, obviously, the bpm of the piece in question. The actual time sig. gets translated by good conductors into 'how easy is it for performers to follow my flailing arms?' | |
| Oct 11, 2019 at 9:11 | history | asked | Rosie F | CC BY-SA 4.0 |