Timeline for What is the correct way to notate a no3/sus chord?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 18, 2020 at 6:42 | comment | added | Tim | @OldBrixtonian - I usually wonder why something has been downvoted. It's not only polite, but useful to give a valid reason. Sadly, it rarely happens. | |
May 18, 2020 at 4:46 | comment | added | John Belzaguy | @Numpy My pleasure, hope my answer helped you even though some nameless person dinged me with a -1. I experimented a bit with that page and any chord that doesn’t have a 2 3 or 4 in it is generically labeled a “sus”. Other than that it seems to work ok. | |
May 18, 2020 at 4:32 | comment | added | Numpy | Thanks for your comments guys. For reference, here is where I saw the sus notation mentioned in my question. Try setting the notes to A, E, G# to find what their algorithm calls the chord. scales-chords.com/chordid.php | |
May 18, 2020 at 4:03 | comment | added | John Belzaguy | @DonHosek I too have seen sus as shorthand for sus4 on charts many, many times and sus4 is probably used at least 20/1 over sus2 but the fact is the 4 should be there for clarity so that’s why I explained it the way I did. | |
May 18, 2020 at 2:42 | comment | added | Don Hosek | I've seen sus on its own enough as a shorthand for sus4 that I would imagine this is a pretty standardized notation. But sus on its own certainly doesn't mean what the OP thinks it does. | |
May 18, 2020 at 1:54 | history | edited | John Belzaguy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 78 characters in body
|
May 18, 2020 at 1:47 | history | answered | John Belzaguy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |