What is the purpose of that equipment and how is it called? I have noticed they always have them in concerts with electronic instruments.
4 Answers
They are called "Stage monitors". Basically they are speakers so that the band members can hear themselves and their fellow musicians more clearly. When the stage is big, it is hard to listen to the amplifiers (both of your instrument and of the others), so the sound techs set up some of those monitors and the musicians can listen to what is being played.
To borrow from Wikipedia:
A stage monitor system is a set of performer-facing loudspeakers called monitor speakers, stage monitors, floor monitors, wedges, or foldbacks on stage during live music performances in which a sound reinforcement system is used to amplify a performance for the audience. The monitor system allows musicians to hear themselves and fellow band members clearly.
-
4I've always wondered (not a musician myself) - How clear are the monitors? Can the band hear the roar of the crowd, or is the audio relatively isolated so the band can hear clearly? (Are there any videos showing examples of using monitors vs. no monitors perhaps?). Is it just a noise war of the monitor volume vs. audience? [Perhaps a new question?] Commented Nov 19, 2021 at 18:22
-
8@BruceWayne Stage monitors can't block out external sound in any way, so you can definitely hear the crowd, and you often have to turn the monitors up quite loud to overpower the crowd (and the drums). making the overall stage volume quite loud. In-ear monitors tend to be safer and provide more clarity, because they actually do block out external sound so you don't need to turn them up so much. Commented Nov 19, 2021 at 19:14
Adding to the existing answers - monitor or foldback speakers - so-called because they literally fold the sound back to the band. Often, especially in open air gigs, the sound is fed to the audience through large p.a. speakers which are in front of the stage, therefore out of earshot of the players/vox.
This results in the sound being lost to those on stage. They might have their own amps/speakers behind them (although what we see are sometimes empty cabinets for publicity purposes), but often their sound is fed directly to the p.a., which then gets mixed by the sound engineer so the audience gets the best sound. That doesn't help the guys on stage, who may only then hear themselves and/or others, through the house p.a., vaguely, hence foldback.
Problem is, there may already be a lot of sound pressure on stage, drums, although mic'd up, still sound loud; guitarists like their volume, etc. And that sound, on a wide, deep stage, gives nothing like the mix the audience hears. But maybe the drummer wants to hear more vox, but the bass wants to hear more drums. That's where individual mixes come in. With many monitors, as in your pic., each can have his own individual mix, tailored by the sound engineer, and that mix, as mentioned earlier, will be very different, often, from the mix sent out front of house.
Unfortunately, all that extra sound can make the stage a very noisy place, in some ways defeating the objective of having foldback and side fills. This is where IEMs come into the equation. In Ear Monitors, 'hearing aids for performers', if you like. They do the same job, but not only make listening to separate mixes easier, better, and more effective, but work to a degree as ear defenders too.
All this often needs extra guys to man the p.a., as the sound not only needs balancing for the audience, but for each individual on stage, separately, at the same time. Meaning very comprehensive p.a.systems which can have many different foldback mixes available, one for each of the foldback speakers and performers.
-
2They serve zero purpose without being "tailored by the sound engineer" +1. The musicians have no direct control over them; they have to ask nicely for adjustments, ideally during the sound check. It's a good sound guy if you never hear feedback and the band doesn't have to stop six times during the show asking for changes because they can't hear each other.– MazuraCommented Nov 20, 2021 at 0:51
-
@Mazura - oh, so true. I've been at both ends, and sometimes as performer, I've just given up with foldback. The 'expert' sound guys know what they like, and like what they know. Unless they're musos themselves, there's often little empathy.– TimCommented Nov 20, 2021 at 8:18
-
This next song's called, Shots for the Band. (cough). And one for the sound guy, please.– MazuraCommented Nov 20, 2021 at 8:23
-
1@Mazura "they have to ask nicely for adjustments, [...] stop six times during the show asking for changes because they can't hear each other." As epitomised by Ritchie Blackmore and Ian Gillan's requests for "Everything louder than everything else" on Deep Purple's Made in Japan live album. Commented Nov 20, 2021 at 17:35
-
@Mazura "The musicians have no direct control over them; they have to ask nicely for adjustments" This is not always the case with newer equipment: for example, my church uses Yamaha TF/CL/QL-series mixers which allow performers to control their individual mixes using a smartphone app. Commented Nov 21, 2021 at 23:41
These are called monitors speakers or stage monitors or floor monitors in this case. In your picture there are more on either side of the stage). Monitors are speakers aimed at the performer to make sure they can hear what they need to hear.
The typical example is the singer: With the loud drum and guitar amps on stage, they would not hear themselves anymore and start singing out of tune. So, their monitor would send back their own voice directly aimed at them.
It is not a perfect solution, as it makes a loud situation even louder and increases risk of feedback loops (unpleasant high pitched tones). So it needs to be carefully balanced.
Usually the sound engineer behind the mixing panel can customize the monitor sound signal for each musician individually. For example: the singer wants hear him/herself and maybe a bit of bass, whereas the bass player wants to hear more hi-hat etc…
See also https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stage_monitor_system
-
1An alternative that solves some of the feedback problems is “in-ear monitoring,” in which the musicians wear what amounts to high-powered earbuds. It takes some getting used to the “artificial,” isolated nature of working that way, but I’ve grown to love it. Commented Nov 19, 2021 at 15:47
Those are stage monitors - basically, general-purpose loudspeakers with built-in amplifiers, designed to sit on the floor and be audible to people standing in front of them. Their purpose is for each musician to hear clearly and reliably what they and their bandmates are playing.
Sometimes in big concerts, you can see a sound engineer standing at a mixer at the side of the stage, adjusting the monitor mix (the volume of each instrument) for each musician. This is not an easy problem: on stage, you have the direct sound from the drums (which can be deafening) and from the guitar and bass amps (whose speakers are sometimes very directional, i.e., they are horribly loud in one spot and barely audible a few steps away). Then you have keyboards and vocals, which don't come with their own amplification, but it's absolutely crucial that the performers hear themselves clearly (especially for vocals); and you have some of the sound of the P.A. system that is directed at the audience reflected back onto the stage. The stage monitors allow to mix and amplify each instrument such that the musicians are not completely lost in the din.
-
I seem to remember that each of the members of U2 had their own separate studio under the stage for their monitor mix, when they performed in large arenas. However, I can't verify that claim.– JosCommented Nov 19, 2021 at 10:49
-
You may be thinking of under-stage keyboardist/engineer Terry Lawless. Photos of his lair, including four mixing consoles: garritan.com/u2-in-concert Commented Nov 19, 2021 at 21:12
-
1