3

Suppose I have a recording of a live concert of a known band. We can assume that the concert was played using instruments that were in tune, in standard tuning. This was in the 1990s, so the concert was recorded to an analog cassette tape (or a DAT master) then distributed to collectors via tape trading. This means that by the time a recording has reached me, it has undergone a few generations of copying from one tape deck to another (dubbing on a double-deck player was typically frowned upon) and there is no guarantee that both tape decks ran at precisely the same speed when copying - quite the contrary was often the case - and the error could accumulate with each generation. This means that the tape in my hands is almost certainly off pitch by a certain degree. Now that I've converted the tape to a digital file I want to repair the error.

My typical method for doing this is to find a song I know how to play, pick up a tuned instrument and play along, tweaking the playback speed until the song matches my instrument. When I find the correct speed change ratio I apply it to the audio file and save the result.

This is great for fixing one or two recordings, not so much when I have a hundred of them.

I think it's theoretically possible for an algorithm to analyze a recording and tell whether it's off pitch, assuming standard tuning. Suppose my recording is sharp by 0.2 semitones the algorithm should be able to suggest a correction of -1.2/-0.2/+0.8/+1.8 (obviously it can't guess which direction is correct, nor how far we are from the original pitch). Googling for pitch correction software invariably leads me to auto-correct plugins for vocal tracks, which is really not what I'm looking for.

Using my fairly strong C++ but very limited understanding of the mathematics of digital signal processing, I tried to write a program that parses the output of sox song.wav -n stat -freq (which performs a DFT on the audio and outputs the results), finding the dominant frequencies and checking whether they match the frequencies for standard notes or deviate from them by a fixed ratio, but I was unable to extract meaningful results - perhaps because the output from sox is rather coarse. So here I am asking whether a tool exists that already implements such an algorithm, or any tips on doing this myself (would I need to perform the DFT using some software library or is the data from sox sufficient? etc), or whether this is a far more complex problem than I imagine, not solvable using simple heuristics.

  • If you still had all the separate tracks, unmixed, there would be a chance, but with a whole recording, especially one that's multi-generation, it's a big ask. – Tim May 28 at 16:34
  • Why do you want to? Different performers & different genres, etc. may choose slightly different original pitches anyway. What do you expect to gain by all this? You'd be much better off either adjusting your instrument's tuning or by digitizing & using pitch-shift software such as Audacity. – Carl Witthoft May 29 at 13:30
3

This is not a full answer. It is perhaps a frame challenge, but it's also just a 'talking-point' kick off that may eventually lead to an answer to a question not yet voiced… bear with me…

Even before we get to fixing the pitch on a digital copy, I'd have several issues to address first… generational loss is absolutely not restricted to speed; azimuth loss is going to be massive, as are EQ 'changes' multiplied & divided.

So… if all you have is a multi-gen copy, the first thing you should do is 'sacrifice' a good cassette player to the cause.

You need a cassette deck you can clip the front face from, so you can reach the azimuth screw as it's playing. You then buy a low-mass tweaker to do this. You cannot do it with a metal screwdriver.
Tweak the azimuth by ear whilst playing the cassette.
This is not a perfect solution - but we're so far beyond perfect solutions at this point.

Next step is to get the case off the cassette deck, find the motor & measure the resistance across the 'speed pot' it has in it - these always have a tiny manual pot to set the speed, often right inside the motor-housing itself. They're bendy-metal clips, so the actual disassembly doesn't require much tech.
You can do this with just a multi-meter, screwdriver & soldering iron.

Measure the resistance across the entire pot, then at the current speed. Guess at values which will give you a better spread somewehere within this you can buffer the pot & that spread [bear with me again]
If your pot is 200Ω & at current speed you're at 70Ω and call it a 20Ω spread.
You can mess with the original pot to see what change produces a tone or two… factor this in. Buy a new 20Ω high-spec pot & resistors of 60Ω & 120Ω [ you may need to add in series to achieve your final values].

Replace your pot with the new one - attractively wired out to the back panel, then buffer it with your make-up gains.
You now have about a tone or two with high confidence & better stability.

Play the tape, fix the azimuth & tweak the speed before you even record it.

If by now you're thinking this is completely & utterly mental, I have a 'Blue Peter' cassette deck exactly like this done for a very very similar project.
Did you know the buggers vari-speed for about the first hour of constant playback too? Well, now you do :P Start any session by playing all of both sides of a 'waste' 60min cassette, til it settles down… then clean the heads [again].

I sacrificed a NAD & a Nakamichi to do this. The Nakamichi was a better machine, overall, but the NAD turned out to behave better after the mods.

oh… & switch off Dolby. You're so far beyond it being of any assistance to accuracy that you ought to just take all the high end you can get, from source.

BTW, there is a piece of software that will take a lot of the grind out of this task… it costs $4000 … yup. Celemony [of Melodyne fame] Capstan

Alternatively… check the record company didn't just officially release the bootlegs - so many of them have been now; they reckon they may as well do it officially & take their cut.
It would be rather sad to go to all this effort then discover it's already on iTunes, in vastly superior quality. [ref: most of the old 1970s Bowie bootlegs]

| improve this answer | |
  • Actually you've given me a full and rather interesting answer. That is, if my question had been "how do I tweak a tape deck for the best possible playback results". Modifying the tape head's azimuth would at best compensate for a badly tuned head on the most recent generation (i.e. the deck used to record one particular tape). This might make one tape sound better but my tapes are from many sources so the process would need to be repeated for each tape; I really don't want to go there. And adjusting my deck's speed is exactly not what I wanted to do. Celemony Capstan is interesting, thanks. – itaych May 31 at 12:50
  • What you're attempting is really one of those "you don't want to start from here" jobs. Fixing azimuth & basic speed first is going to be by far the best solution. Izotope has an azimuth module but software can't perform miracles. The human ear is the best first-guess tool for any task like this. The last time I did this task was a good few years ago - I had nearly 40 cassettes to do, so I feel your pain. I also had 30 ¼" master tapes to first bake, then rescue in the same manner. Overall it took 6 months. – Tetsujin May 31 at 12:59
  • I did mange to scrounge some really high-quality gear off the BBC to do it, though, a Revox & some magnificent pre-amps. ;) – Tetsujin May 31 at 13:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.