1

I am looking for explanations on how to interpret the repeat bar lines used during the 17th century and specifically for German music. The sign ':||:' seems to be employed at that time for repeating the music section between two identically signs. But should I also play twice the section before the first sign, since the beginning of the piece?

If someone has a reference on how these bar lines were interpreted, it would be great.

3

Suppose the music looks like this:

|| A :||: B :||

This should be played: A, A, B, B.

| improve this answer | |
  • Thanks Alex for this quick answer. And if the music looks like to : A :||: B :||: C ||, is it A, A, B, B, C, C ? – RémyClaverie Jun 11 at 16:28
  • 2
    @RémyClaverie This is poorly notated. At the beginning of C you suggest a repeated section, then at the end of C it isn't written as such. I suspect you mean || A :||: B :||: C :|| -- in which case it is played as AABBCC. – Andrew Chin Jun 11 at 17:00
  • 1
    thanks Andrew for your answer but I did not make a mistake. It is exactly A :||: B :||: C ||. See this sonata from Paul Hainlein. – RémyClaverie Jun 11 at 17:20
  • 2
    @RémyClaverie it's quite standard to omit the "repeat the following" sign at the beginning of a piece, which is what your question is explicitly about. In your comment, you note something that is not at all common (I don't recall having seen it before), which is having a section that begins with a "repeat the following" sign but ends without a "repeat the preceding" sign . Perhaps you should edit your question to ask about that instead of, or in addition to, what it now asks. – phoog Jun 11 at 19:28
  • @RémyClaverie for what it's worth, I've found a similar score, but it has a bit of textual instruction as well: youtube.com/watch?v=BwnpUlA_9i8 – phoog Jun 11 at 21:31
-1

Repeat barlines come in pairs. You repeat from the backwards-facing dots to the preceding forward-facing ones. The only exception is for the first instance in a piece of music, when the forward-facing one may be omitted. Omitting one at the end of a piece is an error.

This syntax isn't exclusive to 17th century German music.

The rules are sometimes bent a little. Notoriously so in the orchestra parts of Strauss waltzes, which can be a labyrinth of non-standard nested DS and repeat bar notations. It saves a lot of paper, but it's VERY easy to get lost.

| improve this answer | |
-1

:|| - Go back till you see a ||:, if you don't see any go to start.

So if there's a barline where you need both:|| denoting you have to repeat previous section and ||: saying you have to come till here in the next repeat, then,

:|| + ||: = :||:

It's very confusing when in second or later sections, there is a :|| but no ||: which means you'll go to start and that's why "Go to Start" has a seperate notion, instead of using :||. Its D.C - Da Capo - Go from Start

| improve this answer | |
  • Requesting downvoter to specify why the downvote was casted. Was it a factual error? – RishiNandha_M Jun 12 at 12:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.