11

I was playing 7th chord inversions on the piano and notice that some inversions don't sound as good in the octaves below middle C. For example, a 2nd inversion major 7 chord seems to sound a bit dissonant when played lower (perhaps because of the minor second interval in the inverted maj 7th chord? ). Is this just my imagination or is this true? If it is indeed true, then why does this happen?

  • 2
    its definitely not your imagination. Which voicings sound good depend a lot on the position of the keyboard you are playing them, and there is a loot of teachings on this matter. In general, the lower you are in pitches, the further apart you want your intervals, to avoid muddy and unclear chords, and the further up the more you can use close intervals. I think what you are doing, experimenting with voicing in different ranges and checking if they sound good or not, is the best practice! – hirschme Jul 14 at 14:50
  • It's better to not play root and M7 next to each other in a block chord - wherever they are in the inversion - they sound better nearly an octave apart. – Tim Jul 14 at 15:01
  • 3
    You seem to have discovered the lower interval limit. – leftaroundabout Jul 14 at 15:17
20

Yes, right from our Harmony 101 class in 4-voice vocal writing we're taught that close intervals between the bass and tenor voices low in their ranges are to be avoided (as are over-wide intervals between the upper voices).

enter image description here

Close chords in the low register sound muddy. 'Colour' notes - 7ths, 9ths, even 3rds work better in the upper range. A minor 2nd between upper voices is acceptable, in the bass register it's just ugly. We can explain this by considering the cacophony of overtones from closely-spaced low notes occupying the same range as the melody.

There are exceptions, and instrumentation is a factor. This (below) sounds muddy on a modern piano. But Beethoven often wrote something similar. His piano, with its shorter strings and leather (rather than felt) hammers had a thinner, brighter tone than the modern instrument. Fewer overtones to fight with each other in the midrange.

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
  • 6
    Another exception that perhaps should be mentioned is just intonation. While close chords always sound somewhat clearer higher up than lower down, just chords (say, the triad 4/5/6) sound quite nice even pretty low. – Scott Wallace Jul 14 at 17:37
  • 2
    I might argue that that so-called "muddiness" might have been Beethoven's intent. The opening to the Pathetique Sonata, which is almost exactly what you wrote but in a minor key, is meant to be somewhat dark and heavy, in contrast to the faster-moving parts of the movement. I've heard it played on a period instrument and the effect is still pretty evident despite the thinner tone. It's something of a judgement call to say that any voicing is "bad" or "good". They are different, certainly, but those different qualities may be desired in some cases. – Darrel Hoffman Jul 15 at 13:44
  • @Darrel Hoffman Whether YOU like the sound on a modern Bosendorfer or not, it's difficult to argue with the fact that Beethoven wrote with the sound HIS piano made in mind! Admittedly, Beethoven was sometimes prepared to sacrifice beauty in favour of drama! – Laurence Payne Jul 15 at 20:16
1

When playing harmonically complicated sounds, the overlapping of the lower notes' harmonics within the pitch range of the upper notes contributes to muddiness, as noted by Laurence Payne's answer. When using harmonically simpler sounds, however, another factor comes into play.

A combination of signals at two frequencies f1 and f2 may be perceived either as two separate pitches, or as a single pitch (f1+f2)/2 which, depending upon the relative amplitude of the original signals, wavers at a rate of either f2-f1 or 2(f2-f1). The greater the difference between f1 and f2, the more likely they are to be perceived as separate pitches, and the less likely they are to be perceived as single modulated pitch.

If an organist were to use an 8' flute stop to play a C, E at the bottom of the keyboard (the lower note would be the low C of a cello, though a cello would be much richer harmonically), the pitches would be 65.4Hz and 82.4Hz, respectively, with a difference of 17.0Hz. That difference frequency is low enough that a listener would be likely to perceive a single tone at 73.4Hz--roughly the D between the two pitches--warbling at 17Hz (slightly less than twice as fast as the 10Hz pulses from a rotary phone).

Note that the more harmonically sparse the tones are, the more pronounced this effect will be. Many people perceive the telephone "ringback" sound used in the US and many other countries (which combines pure tones at 440Hz and 480Hz) as a tone with a very fast warble, despite the fact that the 40Hz would be high enough to be heard as a tone in its own right). On the other hand, most instruments produce enough overtones that the sound of playing the C and E an octave higher than those above would be perceived as two distinct tones despite their difference only being 34Hz.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.