0

In Chopin's Waltz in C sharp minor, I'm a bit confused by the following notation:

enter image description here

The F has a natural, cancelling out the sharp in the key signature. But then it instantly becomes an F-sharp again. Once more there is no note to play for the accidental, so I don't understand what this piece of notation is telling me.

I would guess I play the F natural and then the G, then the next F in the bar I play as an F-sharp?

Thank you.

Improve this question
6
  • Is this a published version or a reprint? If it’s a reprint it may be a typo, possibly F natural and G sharp.
    – John Belzaguy
    Sep 11 '20 at 14:55
  • @JohnBelzaguy it is a reprint. Your suggestion makes sense!
    – Mathlearner
    Sep 11 '20 at 14:56
  • Maybe there is a G natural in the preceding bars which would account for the courtesy accidental on the G...
    – John Belzaguy
    Sep 11 '20 at 14:57
  • @JohnBelzaguy Looking back at the previous bar. There is an F double sharp. So would the accidental flatten it to an F and the sharp make it an F sharp again? Not sure.
    – Mathlearner
    Sep 11 '20 at 14:59
  • 1
    There’s your answer by @mattputnam, +1. The natural-sharp in your version is an odd way to cancel a double sharp. I think his version is much easier to read, after all we’re all supposed to know that an accidental is good only for the bar it’s in, right? ;)
    – John Belzaguy
    Sep 11 '20 at 15:10
7

The previous measure has an F double-sharp:

Chopin waltz #2, first 3 measures

The natural-sharp is to remind you that it's no longer double sharp.

Improve this answer
3
  • Obviously the correct answer - made more clear with sight of the previous bar - as suspected, Fx. However, the OP's copy is poor. There's really no need for anything, but if someything was put in, it needed to be in parentheses, as a cutionary, surely? +1
    – Tim
    Sep 11 '20 at 15:17
  • Yes, the original score is bad practice - a # in front of an f means f sharp, NQA, no matter what the context and the key signature is. Writing "natural + accidental" just confuses this rule.
    – Kilian Foth
    Sep 11 '20 at 15:24
  • Natural-sharp like this is actually pretty common and not usually an issue. I don't like it here, mainly because with the F-G cluster it's easy to think one of the accidentals is for the F and the other is for the G (in this case, it would be F-natural and G#). Parentheses are optional.
    – MattPutnam
    Sep 11 '20 at 15:42
2

You need to look at the previous bar as well. There's a Fx (F double-sharp). Technically, this reverts to the single sharp of the key signature in the next bar. Some editions therefore omit any accidental. Some (like the one below) add a cautionary # on the F. Your example uses the old convention of cancelling a double-sharp with a natural-sharp.

Either way, the note in question is F♯. The other note in the dyad is G♯, according to the key signature. And it IS a dyad, a two-note chord. To be played together. The offset - one note each side of the stem - is purely to avoid an ugly printing collision.

enter image description here

Improve this answer
1

To address the last part of your question - both the F(♯) and G(♯) are played at the same time - they just got printed to look like they do, as there isn't room on one side of the stem! Don't ever think of playing them one after the other - that's not correct.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.