I am so paranoid about SATB harmonisation, because there are so many rules, and I feel overwhelmed. I literally feel like I have a hundred hidden mistakes in this question.

harmonization exercise

  • Appreciate if you could change the orientation of the image. Dec 2 '20 at 5:14
  • Did you 1) play the melody on an instrument before attempting the harmonisation 2) play your harmonisation after you had written it and agree that it was what you wanted to write? If so, all power to you
    – Judy N.
    Dec 2 '20 at 21:09
  1. A minor is a problematic choice for your realization, for the reasons you've discovered. Were A minor the intended key, and unless this is a relatively advanced exercise, I would expect all of the given Gs to be G#s. Minor V is unusual in a beginning exercise, as is the prominent use of III chords.

The most important factor in answering your question is whether or not the key signatures are given, or whether part of the exercise is determining the key.

  1. My feeling (with an assist from @MattL) is that the strongest realization would be in G major, ending on a half cadence (D major -- the V chord of G major). Nearly all of the melody notes are part of the G major triad, with the non-triad-tones (A) in weak rhythmic positions -- clearly passing tones.

  2. If you're supposed to use the given key signature, then I would realize this exercise in C major, ending on a deceptive cadence (A minor). That's because of the G naturals. Were the excerpt to be in A minor, I would expect G#s (unless this is an advanced exercise where minor V is expected). However, one would still need a G# in the second-to-last chord, risking a cross-relation with the G natural at the beginning of the measure.

  • 2
    It looks very much like G is the intended key.
    – Matt L.
    Dec 2 '20 at 7:43
  • 1
    @MattL. Agreed. I've revised to reflect that. Thanks for prompting me to rethink the post.
    – Aaron
    Dec 2 '20 at 8:09
  • I don't disagree that seeing this melody as a-minor is unusual for SATB – but IMO it's actually quite pretty. Folky. By comparison, in G-major it's more of a silly fanfare. Dec 3 '20 at 0:44

Is this really presented with no key signature?

That is the most confusing part about it. The melody so obviously is in G major (key signature of one sharp) but this has a key signature of zero sharps/flats.

The reason the key signature matters isn't a nit-picky gripe, it has bearing on the strategy for harmonizing, which should be done with chords that make sense within the key!

You should already have some harmonization procedure, but here are a few strategies you can consider. Ideally you want to understand the harmonic implications of the tones of the melody within the key and first fill in a bass that supports those harmonies.

The tune...

enter image description here

Try a "reduction" to get the main harmonic events...

enter image description here

...that can be fleshed out a bit with some of the other strong tones which are also from the outlined triad which we will consider the tonic...

enter image description here

...notice above how ^5 and ^2 are first recognized in terms of their harmonic/tonal role within the key, this is important. For example, consider ^3, the B4. In some harmonization methods you will be told you can harmonize it with triads I, iii, or vi. That's true, but in tonal music tonic/dominant harmony is the primary focus. In that regard ^3 is a member of the tonic chord. Similarly ^2 could be part of a ii triad, but in terms of tonic/dominant it is a member of V.

Look for melodic/voice leading formulas. This is probably only going to come from experience. I noticed some "voice exchanges." That's when the root and third of a chord "exchange" or alternate in a part. An common harmonization of an exchange is just the reversal of the move in the harmonizing part...

enter image description here

...that give a nearly complete bass. Fill in the inner voices...

enter image description here

...that may be a boring harmonization, but the original tunes only outlines a tonic chord. You could move around some of the tones of the inner voices to give them a bit more interest, but I don't think it will matter much. You could harmonize it some other way than tonic/dominant, but I think the point of the assignment is use basic harmony.

The important thing is to understand the tonality of the original melody and first add a good bass. Adding the bass alone should make the harmony clear. It will be only two parts, but the implied chords should be clear. Filling in the inner voices is then fairly straight forward.

  • Yes, this melody really feels like it's in G, and ends on the V chord. I'm curious why the key signature doesn't show F#. Of course it could be just the modulated section of a larger piece, but that doesn't seem like a typical thing to expect in a harmony exercise.
    – Mark
    Dec 2 '20 at 23:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.