3

If an instrument with slow decay plays a fast melody, dissonance from the last note and the decay of the previous note can easily produce dissonance.

Is there a technical term for this specific kind of dissonance?

7
  • 1
    Do you mean sustain of the first note? When you say that the decay is "slow" I tend to think of it as sustaining too long. Whereas "decay" leads me to think there won't be any harmony between the first and last note. I would be interested to see what answers emerge. I would guess dissonance is dissonance and this is just one of many ways to create it with harmony. By the way, if an instrument decays slowly and note are not meant to be sustained then I would think the player should mute the older notes. Can you give and example of an instrument? – ggcg Jan 1 at 20:30
  • For example guitar where older notes are not muted. – Invariant Jan 1 at 20:33
  • If you meant to sustain the notes then you are basically creating harmony and I would think that it's just one example of dissonant harmony. If, on the other hand, the note was not supposed to be sustained then the piece is being played incorrectly or with poor technique. – ggcg Jan 1 at 20:35
  • 5
    I'll be delighted to be wrong, but I don't think there is a specific term for dissonance where some of the contributory notes are in their decay phase. Excellent question though! – topo Reinstate Monica Jan 1 at 21:40
  • 1
    This is easily reproduced on the piano by holding down the damper pedal. The technical term for this effect is, I believe, "muddy". :-) – Aaron Jan 2 at 10:26
0

Although I don't think there's a widely-accepted term for the specific phenomenon you're describing, it has some analogy to appoggiatura, which is sometimes done with a tone in the melody from the previous beat that is "held over" for a moment in the following beat after the chord changes. The analogy isn't perfect, because an appoggiatura is actively resolved to a consonant tone, whereas in the situation you're describing the sound simply decays away. The effect is somewhat similar, though, because it results in a "dissonant attack" that quickly leads to consonance as the dissonant element dissipates, and if the appoggiatura is done with the note from the previous beat it also has something of an "echo-y" character.

If you want to refer to this phenomenon concisely, I think a lot of people would understand you if you used a phrase like "clashing decay" or similar, although you might have to explain yourself initially. My guess as to why there's not a widely-used jargon term is because an instrument with long decay decays everything homogeneously, so unless the decay is very long, you tend to hear it as a kind of echo or reverb (i.e. part of the texture) as opposed to having a functional role in the harmony. When I'm frustrated with this characteristic in an electronic instrument, i.e. when trying to work with fast lines as you describe, I usually call it "smearing", but more because the notes tend to run together than that they form dissonances.

As a side note, if you're interested in this phenomenon, I encourage you try composing music with one or more of the voices delayed by some ratio of the beat, so that the harmony and counterpoint gestures you normally turn to come out "phased" or what have you. You can find very nice things this way.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.