1

I need opinions on the notation of cross-staff notes in piano arpeggios. I chose not to write the usual rests so that my page would have a clean look. I cannot beam the notes of the whole arpeggio because I am using quarter notes. The piece is arranged for advanced beginners. See the image. Is it ok to discard the rests?

enter image description here

3
  • to me this notation seems clear. Jan 16 at 17:44
  • What rests? You have two completely uninterrupted voices, there is no need to complicate things with rests even if you do switch staffs. Jan 18 at 8:20
  • Thank you all. There is not complete agreement here, so I will go with my first instinct--to omit the rests. Kilian, it is standard in piano music put a rest on beat 1 of measure 2 in bass clef, and on beats 2 & 3 (low on the staff) in treble. I am willing to break this rule and your response reinforced that decision. Thanks. Jan 19 at 13:46
2

No, it's not ok to discard the rests in this case. And honestly, It'd be far more readable if you put the E on a ledger line in the bass staff. Unless for some reason you absolutely want them to play that with the right hand?

3
  • Thank you. Yes the E should be played with the RH because of the LH finger 4 on the low E . Also, it's a beginner piece and some kids may not be able to stretch to the octave. Jan 16 at 16:10
  • 1
    Without the rest of the context of the measure before the excerpt, I'd rather use the pinky for the E labelled with the ring finger.
    – Dekkadeci
    Jan 16 at 19:33
  • Beginners may have a problem releasing the E in the right hand without releasing the G as well. But perhaps that is a good teaching point.
    – Peter
    Jan 17 at 10:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.