I'm well aware that longer finger nails are common on the strumming hands of flamenco and classical guitarists. I'm thinking of trimming my nails right back to see if this would impair playing, because, as it is, I usually have one nail chewed up by the strings, which, as you know, is horrible to work with.

I'd like to know from those who play with short finger nails, particularly flamenco guitarists, if they are happy with the change.

  • 1
    How are you "chewing up" a nail on the strings? Perhaps you are playing too hard. – user50691 Jan 27 at 22:36
  • Flamenco playing can be forceful at times, and on steel strings, this is a problem for me. And I know I'm not the first to deal with this problem. – Beginner Biker Jan 28 at 1:00
  • I would not have guessed you were playing steel strings – user50691 Jan 28 at 1:21
  • ^ true enough. There are few flamenco guitars built for steel strings. – Beginner Biker Jan 28 at 1:35

You really need to provide a definition of long for the question to make any sense. If you look at a classical method book from one of the greats, like Pepe Romero or Christopher Parkening, you will see that the nails of the "strumming hand" should not be very long at all maybe a millimeter or two beyond the flesh. The string should touch the flesh near the nail when making contact, then the nail acts as a ramp for the string slide off. So, if you have maintained your nails properly they should not be that long. They are not used as picks. When the nails get too long they can hook the string and that is a huge impediment to good playing.

As for no nails? I have heard that some masters require their students to learn without nails so they get used to the feeling of the sting on the flesh, then after some time they grow nails. I believe Pepe Romero talked about his father making him and his brothers learn this way. But I don't know of any with NO nails.

  • 1
    Yes, but this is a bit too absolute. Flamenco has a lot of different techniques, and some of them definitely do use the nails as-a-pick-ish rather than giving the flesh the main task. – leftaroundabout Jan 27 at 22:44
  • But the question was quite ambiguous citing both flamenco and classical. Romero plays both and I trust his book – user50691 Jan 27 at 23:31
  • 1
    Fernando Sor's method recommends very short nails. – luser droog Jan 28 at 6:33
  • 1
    @luserdroog: I seem to recall Sor played without nails? – Willem van Rumpt Jan 28 at 9:36

Lacking many answers, here's my tuppenceworth.

Playing guitar with fingers (as opposed to a pick) gives options. To play with the flesh of a fingertip or the nail itself. When nails are too long (what constitutes too?) there's every chance that all the notes will be produced when those nails come into conact with the strings - it's very difficult to pluck using just flesh. Unless one wants to play everything with those nails, in which case, grow them as long as you want, but them that is compromised by their breakability.

So, nails long (short?) enough to give the option of nail or flesh makes most sense (to me). 1 1/2 - 2mm would seem to give a fair balance for general playing.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.