I just came across the score for Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata, and I was surprised when I saw the time signature of the first movement.

(My background is that I've played music for many years—mainly guitars and keyboard—but not studied music theory beyond what was covered in piano lessons as a child. So I have a basic understanding of time signatures, note values, triplets and suchlike, and am used to working with them. Although while the C-shaped time signature symbol means 4/4 or Common Time, I did have to search to learn that the vertical line through it means either tempus imperfectum diminutum or Alla breve.)

My surprise came when I saw that the movement is written in 4/4 (or is it 2/2?), with the melody as triplets across it. Without really thinking about it, I had assumed it would be in something like 6/8.

Previously, I've only encountered triplets as occasional exceptions that bring a certain emphasis to short sections by their contrast. Yet here, triplets are the norm for the entire movement. What is going on here?

  • 1
    Just to confirm your side point, by the way: the time signature of “c with a line through” does indeed mean 2/2. It’s very commonly used in classical music, and usually known as “cut time”. “Alla breve” is less common and a bit more acaedmic/formal, at least in my experience. And only specialists/enthusiasts will have heard of “tempus imperfectum diminutum” — that’s very archaic terminology from mediaeval music, and as far as I know it ’s now used only in the study of such early music.
    – PLL
    Feb 6, 2021 at 12:01

2 Answers 2


In piano music (at least) it fairly common to write in 4/4 time with all triplets. This most frequently happens when the melody itself is best expressed in 4/4, while the accompaniment, in triplets, could otherwise be expressed in 12/8.


"Moonlight" Sonata"
This is the case of the "Moonlight" Sonata. While the accompaniment is in triplets throughout, the melody is a "4/4" (actually 2/2) melody. The below image shows the initial entrance of the melody in measured 5-7.

"Moonlight" Sonata mm. 5-7

Expressing this in 12/8 would be somewhat misleading, in that it would imply the primacy of the triplets as well as being harder to read. (It would also suggest a 4-beat metric accent pattern rather than 2-beat.)

X: 1
T: Moonlight Sonata
T: in 12/8 time
M: 12/8
K: C# minor
L: 1/8
%%score (V1 | V2)V:V1
[V:V1] z6 z3 (2:3:2G3/2G/2 | G6-G3 (2:3:2G3/2G/2 | G6
[V:V2 stem=down] G,CE G,CE G,CE G,CE | G,DF G,DF G,DF G,DF |

Chopin Nocturne in F Major (Op. 15, No. 1)

This kind of "12/8 written as 4/4" is characteristic of Chopin's Nocturnes. The accompaniment is often triplet based, but the melodies are 4/4. The following example, from Op. 15, No. 1 in F major, is written in 3/4, though the accompaniment is in 9/8.

Chopin Op. 15 No. 1, mm. 1-4

Chopin Noturne in Eb Major (Op. 9, No. 2)

By contrast, consider Chopin's Nocturne in Eb Major (Op. 9, No. 2). Here, the piece is given in 12/8; but note that in this case, the melody is also triplet based.

Chopin Nocturne in Eb Major, m. 1

Chopin Nocturne in B Major (Op. 9, No. 3)

A particularly illuminating example comes from Chopin's Nocturne in B major (Op. 9, No. 3), which employs both 6/8 (for the A section) and 2/2 (for the B section).

Chopin Op. 15 No. 3, mm. 1-4
Chopin Op. 15 No. 3, mm. 88-89

  • I always thought that the bass was the accompaniment and that the triplets were the melody...
    – mathlander
    Feb 21, 2023 at 20:53

If you look further in the score, you will notice sixteenth notes in the melody (dotted rhythm, strictly speaking). Notating or reading this in 6/8 would be much more awkward.

Compare clarity of the rhythm notation in these two measures:

enter image description here

See some more related discussion:

How to play this rhythm in Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata? as a 4/3 polyrythm or as 6/16?

Piano: quaver triplets in RH v dotted quaver and semiquaver in LH

Developing Hand independence and Finger independence

Why is the last semiquaver outside the last triplet of the measure?

  • Your notated examples are not equivalent. In 4/4 time, a sixteenth-note is one fourth of a (quarter-note) beat; whereas in 6/8 time, a 32nd-note is 1/12th of a (dotted-quarter-note) beat.
    – Aaron
    Feb 5, 2021 at 22:13
  • 4
    @Aaron Yes, they are equivalent. A quarter note is 2/3 of the beat, plus 32nd note, which is, as you correctly point, 1/12 of the beat give 2/3 + 1/12 = 8/12 + 1/12 = 9/12 = 3/4 of the beat. Dotted 16th note is 3/12 = 1/4 of the beat. 3/4 + 1/4 corresponds to the proportions of the dotted rhythm from the first measure. Your question demonstrates how inconvenient it would be to use such notation. Feb 5, 2021 at 22:18
  • 2
    Ah, I see. I missed the dot. Thanks for setting me straight.
    – Aaron
    Feb 5, 2021 at 22:21
  • 1
    @Aaron Not your fault, I made it show how bad it would look like. Maybe with use of duplet notation it would look better, but I think musicians are more used to and trained to read triplet rhythms. Feb 5, 2021 at 22:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.