The V cord is often referred to as the "dominant chord" in the I, IV and V progression. But I'm finding that the IV chord can often take on the character of "driving" the song, as if it is meant to be played harder/louder at times. Is there any consensus on this thought?

  • 1
    "Dominant" is a historical term for the V chord; it doesn't literally mean that the V chord "dominates" the music.
    – Aaron
    Sep 23, 2021 at 19:13
  • 3
    call it the IV or "four" chord, or call it the "subdominant." Calling the fourth chords sounds like I should look at the chord in the fourth bar, or the fourth one in the progression. Sep 23, 2021 at 19:35
  • 1
    @Aaron, I don't know if the OP means this, but I think for many the dominant is thought of as a pinnacle of tension which would be the principle source of harmonic drive. Not literally dominating the music. Sep 23, 2021 at 21:01
  • 1
    You may enjoy this YouTube video, where a theory channel discusses "standing on the predominant", or in other words, predominant prolongation. Taipale describes the feeling of energy and motion as coming from the subdominant chord, which seems to line up with your perceptions.
    – user45266
    Sep 24, 2021 at 5:43
  • 1
    I think there's a framing error in your question : you are taking subdominant to mean subsidiary to dominant. But in fact it means dominant-downwards ie as dominant is fifth up, sub-dominant is fifth down britannica.com/art/subdominant
    – Rusi
    Sep 24, 2021 at 7:12

3 Answers 3


Descriptions like this can become a bit subjective and vague, but we can still try to explain what is felt.

I would suggest there are two things going on:

In common practice, "classical" harmony the standard functional progression is subdominant IV to dominant V to tonic I. But in that paradigm we can also say the tonic/dominant pair is basic harmonic dynamic. In other words a huge amount of classical harmony is alternating between I and V. I could be said that the motion between I and V becomes almost a harmonic non-event, because it is so common. If the harmony is heavily tonic/dominant like that, when a subdominant is introduced it is pretty noticeable, and glossing over a bunch of potential detail, it sort of announces the coming dominant. That "announcing" certainly can feel like a major harmonic "driver."

The other possible explanation is a bit of classical theory combined with blues/rock style. While IV V I is a progression that exemplifies functional progression, with subdominant to dominant to tonic representing stages of forward progress, there is another model of progress: prolongation.

Let's return to the functional progression IV V I just for a moment and think of that forward progress in syntactic terms. It's a bit like "he kicks the ball into the goal." Each unit is connected with a certain necessity: boys kick, balls get kicked, kicked balls go into goals. Musically subdominants go to dominants, and dominants go to tonics, tonics ultimately are the end.

Prolongation also provides forward movement, but the "engine" behind it is different. Harmonically a prolongation is something like I IV I, which would specifically be a tonic prolongation. We could say that syntactically it really reduces to I, and the IV is just an interposed elaboration of I.

Because you can reduce such prolongations they are sometimes describe in a way that makes them seem less essential, nevertheless they still provide forward progress. I suppose you could say prolongations provide elaboration detail that creates anticipation for the eventual continuation. Linguistically it's like taking the dull phrase "he kicked the ball..." and starting it with an elaboration "the boy, who was the star of the team, with all his might..." which sort of builds things up for "kicked the ball."

In a typical 12 bar blues the IV chord works as an elaboration of I during the first 8 bars...

I  IV I  I

When the final 4 bars of the turnaround are played...


...we can see the V leading back to I - when the 12 bars get repeated - satisfies our "functional" sense of dominant to tonic progression as a harmonic driver, but the prolongation through IV that happens in the first 8 bars in another important harmonic driver. Imagine how static the first 8 bars would be if it were all tonic.

Your question is specifically about I IV V and I think the "drive" created by IV is simply the "announcing" the dominant will be coming next. But, I thought it was important to mention IV in prolongation and it is a driver too.

Maybe there is a bigger point to make about human nature. Perhaps anticipating an event is more significant that the event itself. So, IV is a big driver, because we savor the anticipation leading to V. And to be very clear about our functional progressions V to I is the end. Ending isn't much of a driver. So, tonic/dominant is the structural foundation, but IV to V is the real dynamic driver.

  • Thorough analysis. I've often "felt" the IV chord to be extremely melodic in itself, without thinking of how to resolve it via the tonic or dominate, although that feeling is certainly there. Sep 23, 2021 at 21:12

It's important to understand that subdominant doesn't mean "just below the tonic," but rather "equally far away from the tonic just in the opposite direction.

Key of C


IV. -------- I. -------- V

Notice above that (if C is the tonic) G is the dominant five steps above and F is the subdominant five steps below. The same is true for the mediant (E) and submediant (A).

In many compositions from many different periods, if one of these two (dominant, subdominant) is used extensively in a piece, visiting the other makes a satisfying ending.

Also bear in mind that The subdominant-tonic relationship in one key is the tonic-dominant relationship in another. Below, in the key of F, the F-C functions as I-V whereas in the key of C it was IV-I.

Key of F

Bb C D E F G A Bb C

IV. ---------I. -------------V

  • This is true, and corrects a common misunderstanding, but not necessarily an answer to the question. Sep 24, 2021 at 12:29
  • @ nuggethead ... I think you touched on it. If the subD is played lower on the register and comes up to the tonic, the feeling of driving is strong. Sep 24, 2021 at 13:42
  • @Beginner Biker I think your example would be more the function of the leading tone B. I've always felt the subdominant pulls downward, fa to mi.
    – nuggethead
    Sep 24, 2021 at 22:47

The word "dominant" is part of the "tonal system" of thinking about the functions of chords within a key. It doesn't necessarily imply anything about dynamics or volume (though you might be able to draw some generalizations about it). Its "dominant" role in a key has more to do with what its job is and how well it can do it.

The concept of tonality is built on the idea of moving away from the "tonic," the "I" chord, the "home base" of the key, and then wanting to get back to it. The dominant is the chord that most strongly sets up an expectation of the tonic coming next. Other chords in a progression are usually there just to set up the dominant (thus IV is the "predominant"), and once the dominant comes along it takes its big moment to "resolve" to the tonic. Your sense of the "driving" tension of the IV probably comes from its role in leading to the V, but it doesn't have anything to do with the evolution of the names of the chord functions.

  • Dominant was used in Chant theory (600AD or so) to mean the tone generally used most often. In the D, F, and G modes, it was the fifth above; in the E mode, it was C. There were several other names; the "finalis" was the tone used to end a chant (later used to mean tonic, etc.) The other names are positional; mediant is halfway between the tonic and dominant; subdominant is just below the dominant, and submediant is just below the mediant.
    – ttw
    Sep 24, 2021 at 3:12
  • 1
    @ttw actually subdominant means away from the tonic in the opposite direction not one step below the dominant. Submediant means the same, its the same distance below the tonic as the mediant is above. See my answer below for a longer explanation
    – nuggethead
    Sep 24, 2021 at 10:24
  • 1
    @ttw In addition to nuggethead's comments, note that the submediant is not below the mediant. It is below the leading tone. So that particular example case fails.
    – user45266
    Sep 24, 2021 at 21:43
  • The comments are probably correct. The mediant is halfway to the dominant and the sub-mediant is halfway to the subdominant. I like user45266 and nuggethead's comments better.
    – ttw
    Sep 24, 2021 at 23:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.