My question is from my MUS 204 course, which is the following: How many cents comprise a quarter-tone in 15-EDO?

I believe I am missing one piece of knowledge to answering such a seemingly simple question. First, I understand a quarter-tone is 50 cents and second, I understand the frequency ratio in 15-EDO, correct me if I'm wrong, is 2^1/15 and a cent is 1/1200 of an octave.

I wanted to solve the problem similar to solving for the number of cents in just perfect fifth. (i.e., log of base 2 to the 3/2 = (number of cents)/1200, which is approx. 702 cents.) However, substituting 3/2 for 1/15 produces an incorrect number. (The correct number should be 80 cents.)

What correct steps must be taken to find the correct answer to the question above?

  • 6
    I find this question dubious. IMO there aren't any quarter tones in 15-edo. Oct 9, 2021 at 22:55
  • @leftaroundabout I answered on this basis
    – user28245
    Oct 10, 2021 at 6:49

4 Answers 4


Taking 12-EDO as a starting point...

  1. 12-EDO divides the octave into 12 semitones and, therefore, 24 quarter tones.
  2. The purpose of "cents" is to divide the octave using a linear scale rather than an exponential one.
  3. An octave being 1200 cents means that each 12-EDO quarter tone is 1200/24 = 50 cents.

15-EDO is to be treated analogously.

  1. 15-EDO divides the octave in 15 "semitones" and, therefore, 30 "quarter tones".
  2. It follows, then, that each 15-EDO quarter tone is 1200/30 = 40 cents.

As pointed out in the comments, the original textbook question is a dubious one. The concepts of "tone", "semitone", "quarter tone", and "perfect fifth" have specific meanings in 12-EDO that don't transfer — or, at least, don't necessarily transfer — to other EDO systems. It's misleading to speak of semitones and quarter tones, etc., in the context of 15-EDO.

  • 4
    I do not like it. By the same logic, a “quarter-tone in 22-edo” would be 27.3 cents, but that interval certainly shouldn't be called a quarter tone. Oct 9, 2021 at 22:53
  • 2
    @leftaroundabout It depends on what is considered a "tone" or "semitone" within the context of the particular tuning system. Given that the question originates in Music 204, I take it to be that they're trying to make a simple analogy with nice math rather than a generalized definition across EDOs. Frankly, I don't like the textbook question that prompted this, for exactly the reason you allude to: it's misleading to refer to 12-EDO concepts (semitone, quarter tone, perfect fifth) in the context of 15- or any other -EDO.
    – Aaron
    Oct 9, 2021 at 22:57
  • @leftaroundabout I've added a qualifying explanation to the answer. Would value your opinion on whether it offers an adequate caveat.
    – Aaron
    Oct 9, 2021 at 23:00
  • 1
    @PiedPiper The underlying frequencies, yes, but the math for cents themselves is linear, which I've understood to be the point of using cents.
    – Aaron
    Oct 10, 2021 at 15:01
  • 1
    @phoog that would make cent scale rather useless in comparing various temperaments or divisions. Oct 11, 2021 at 1:20

substituting 3/2 for 1/15 produces an incorrect number

This is where you made a mistake. The formula to calculate number of cents between two frequencies f₁ and f₀ is:


For perfect fifth ratio of frequencies f₁/f₀ = 3/2 (in just intonation). However for a semitone in 15-EDO ratio of frequencies is not 1/15. It is 2¹⸍¹⁵.

Then the formulae are as follows: a semitone in 12-EDO has:

1200·log₂(2¹⸍¹²) = 1200·(1/12)·log₂(2) = 1200·(1/12) = 100 cents

Similarly, a semitone in 15-EDO is

1200·log₂(2¹⸍¹⁵) = 1200·(1/15)·log₂(2) = 1200·(1/15) = 80 cents

For a "quarter-tone", that is half of a semitone, in 15–EDO substitute 2¹⸍¹⁵ with 2¹⸍³⁰ to obtain 40 cents.

  • 1
    This is a useful answer, but just know, OP does indicate 2^1/15 for the semitone. You may want to revise your description of where OP misunderstood the math.
    – Aaron
    Oct 10, 2021 at 6:35
  • @Aaron OP wrote explicitly she "substituted 3/2 with 1/15" and that's a mistake. It might be a random error or maybe misunderstanding of where which numbers should go, but this is where discrepancy in calculations originates. Oct 10, 2021 at 6:53
  • Yes, I understand the error you're correcting. I just think you're explanation of what the error was isn't quite clear.
    – Aaron
    Oct 10, 2021 at 11:53
  • ...specifically, the second sentence of your explanation. IMO, that could be usefully clarified.
    – Aaron
    Oct 10, 2021 at 12:02
  • @Aaron I tried to clarify the answer. However I don't quite understand what is unclear in sentence "For a perfect fifth ratio of frequencies equals 3/2"? Oct 10, 2021 at 15:13

TL;DR: This question is nonsensical.

Quarter tones simply don't exist in 12-EDO, since there is no way whatsoever to play one. They only exist in 24-EDO, and if you've added a ton of extra pitches in the middle, you are, clearly, not using 12-EDO in the first place.

Similarly, 15-EDO literally means one single step is 2^1/15, which comes to 80 cents exactly. That, and all multiples of it, are the only intervals that can even be played.

Whatever meaning you assign to a quarter tone, it's reasonable to assume it's somewhere around 50 cents, maybe a bit higher. By the plain English reading, 4 of these things should add up to a whole tone, 200 cents or so. 80 cents is just way too far off from 50 - it's more than half again as large!

A 31-cent error, for example, stands between the actual 7th harmonic, less 3 octaves, and the major second of 12-EDO. Nobody claims 12-EDO is remotely capable of representing this interval. It just doesn't exist here.

The answer is: in 15-EDO, there is no playable interval that is remotely usable as a "quarter tone".

  • 3
    This doesn't address the OP's issue all. If you could rephrase it in a more polite way, it could make a valid comment about semantics. Oct 10, 2021 at 7:19
  • Surely with guitar, trombone, violin, any extra pitches can be played.
    – Tim
    Oct 10, 2021 at 12:14

TBH I'm a musician and piano tuner, and not a mathematician. But my understanding is that equal temperment tuning on a piano reveals a mathematical discrepancy known as the Pythagorian Comma. It has to be said that merely understanding the mathematics of the equally tempered scale does not in and of itself make someone a good piano tuner!

As to quarter-tones, this is not a term used much by musicologists. Instead, the term micro-tones are used. The best examples I can think of where micro-tones are used would be either Arabic music, or Gamalan music (from, say, Bali, Sumatra, etc.).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.