I would like to know what is the best recording and effects chain that I can apply to my recording setup. I use a Focusrite Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen and an Aston Spirit. The room is untreated and I will be getting a suitable Shield shortly. In the meantime I would like to know if anyone knew more about this mic and the useful effects that help clean up a recording. For now I intervene with a multiband compressor, an Eq that takes care of cutting the lows and working the sound on the mid-highs, a de-esser and further effects for adjusting the voices for which I pass the recording. Can I still improve the result? Maybe by setting the microphone at the right distance from the person or with other effects that can clean my recording?

EDIT: 27/04/2022

What do I need to take into account more in order to improve the quality of my recordings? for example the chain of effects that can use the creation of the background buzz or increase it?

  • 1
    Welcome! This sounds like perhaps a better fit at the Sound Design stack exchange. Apr 19, 2022 at 22:08
  • 1
    It's impossible to tell arbitrarily what effects you need. Sometimes a well recorded track doesn't require any further processing. If you don't specify what issue you want to solve, it might be difficult to answer. Moreover indeed SD might be a better site for such question. Apr 19, 2022 at 22:25
  • The plugins that make something sound as desired are not related to the mic, they are related to the source audio and the desired final sound. We can’t tell you what to do without hearing the source audio and getting a detailed description of the desired result and then that question would be too broad for this site Apr 20, 2022 at 1:05
  • 1
    You'd probably get a better result hanging a duvet behind the singer than putting one of those 'can we have your money please' shields behind the mic. You'll be using cardioid for vox, so anything behind the mic is already being rejected.
    – Tetsujin
    Apr 20, 2022 at 7:03
  • 1
    @AndyBonner - I'm on both the Cubase & Logic groups on farcebork. One of the most repeated questions is "What's the best plugin chain for vocals?" It always attracts dozens of wildly varying opinions - none of which I would ever use myself - but for some reason everybody seems to be of the opinion that there is something that could be actually quantified as best without ever knowing or hearing the source material. I just don't get it ;)) I think it's a 'run before you can walk' question. "I'm new to all this, but I'm sure if someone tells me the 'correct' plugins, I can be great."
    – Tetsujin
    Apr 20, 2022 at 16:49

1 Answer 1


As commenters have said, there's no way to decide what "fixes" to apply without knowing what "defects" exist in the recording.

In my home studio, there is only one "effect" that I might apply as a matter of course to microphone recording of vocal tracks without much regard for the source audio or the context of the rest of the mix: A high-pass EQ (low-frequency roll-off). All but the most profondo of bassos produce little below about 80 Hz, and the roll-off removes a lot of unwanted urban (e.g. railroad locomotive rumble) and building mechanical (e.g. ventilation fan motor) noises.

Everything else should be considered only in the context of the particular singer, material, accompaniment, acoustics, and desired mixing outcome.

Your choice of interface doesn't make much difference in this setting. Any difference between the Scarlett Solo and a comparable product (or earlier generation of the same product for that matter) is likely imperceptible in your application.

I don't know your microphone firsthand, but I see from the product specifications that it is switchable between omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-8. How have you been using it? Cardioid is probably your best choice for a single vocalist not far from the microphone, but note that this pattern will have some proximity effect, increasing low frequencies on nearer sources. How to use this depends on your desired outcome.

I see that your microphone has a switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter built in. It's best to use it there where appropriate (rather than with an EQ plug-in), because at the microphone, it can remove unwanted low frequencies before they have a chance to use up your preamp's headroom (and by extension, your recorded audio's resolution.)

As for acoustics: You probably have many issues in a completely untreated room, including most importantly:

  1. Comb-filtering caused by reflections. This causes strong peaks and valleys in the frequency response that vary with small changes of the position of the microphone and source (singer) with respect to the walls, ceiling and floor.
  2. Standing waves which cause the bass frequencies to pile up or cancel out at certain locations in the room. Search online for room modes calculators to see which frequencies are the greatest concern in your room.
  3. Assuming you are listening in the same untreated room, you are unable to accurately judge the recording you have made, which leads you to believe all kinds of corrections are necessary. Caused by both the issues above, and highly dependent on the position of the listener and monitors with respect to reflective surfaces.

I suggest you learn about acoustics and treatments. (As a starting point, try some of Ethan Winer's articles like this: Acoustic Treatment and Design for Recording Studios and Listening Rooms)

If you improve your recording and (especially) listening environment, you'll better be able to trust your ears to decide whether signal-processing corrections like EQ are needed, and which ones.

Unless you are a broadcast engineer, dynamics processing (e.g. compressors and limiters) are primarily an artistic choice not a corrective one, and thus dependent on style. One exception might be when you're stuck with an irregular vocal take, and you can't fix it with automated track gain. Either way it's not something just to apply all the time.

A de-esser (really a special form of dynamics processing) should also only be applied if it's really needed and a better take of the vocal is not possible. There are dozens of online articles covering microphone techniques to avoid sibilance.

Lastly: Don't wear a hat.

  • Like this. It covers a lot of the bases & manages to be fairly generic without being bland. +1 for 'get your mic technique right rather than use a de-esser'. I don't think I've actually used a de-esser on my own work in 15 years.
    – Tetsujin
    Apr 20, 2022 at 16:56
  • +1 for many things, but especially for the hat link: I’d never even thought of that, but then I don’t wear hats…! Apr 20, 2022 at 17:12
  • 1
    @BobBroadley That was just a lucky find. I headed to Bob's page looking for another reference and happened to see that.
    – Theodore
    Apr 20, 2022 at 17:53

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.