3

I sometimes try to analyze the harmony of a Bach prelude to understand how chords change, and how he manages to shift from one key to another. Here is the prelude in Cm BWV 847 (source image, MP3 here):

Prelude in C minor, BWV 847, mm. 1–18

Here is what I understand:

BAR    CHORD  DEGREE / KEY
              [Cm key]     [Gm key]      [Fm key]
1      Cm     I
2      Fm     IV
3      G      V 
4      Cm     I
5      Ab     VI    =      IIb ?
6      D                   V
7      Gm                  I
8      C7                  IV      =     V
9      Fm                                I  

Would you have a similar analysis or are the key changes on bars 5 and 8 incorrect?


Notes: I'm using capital letters for every degree, I don't write I for major and i for minor, I hope it's understandable. Also I haven't written the chords "with bass", for example bar 5 it should Ab/C for Ab major chord with bass C.

2

2 Answers 2

2

First of all, I suggest you study chords in BWV 846 which contains much to indicate why your strict harmony approach is limited.

Let me just remark on a few things. In Bach's music, as in much of that time, melodies can force the music to go in a different direction from where the harmony wants to go. So you need to look at melodic lines here.

To me the sequence of measures starting at 5 is a two interlinked chains of tension-release. In the melody there are the pairs Eb-D, D-C, C-Bb &c, with in the bass C-Bb Bb-Ab Ab-G. (In the left hand there is a middle voice going A-Bb G-Ab along with the bass.)

Yes, that is a sequence of II-V but that alone does not explain the overall structure. For instance, the transition measure 4->5->6 to me is driven by the G->Ab->A melodic motion. Chromatic up means increasing tension, so that gives you the starting point for the sequence of II-V resolutions.

1

As a starting point, I disagree with the analysis of m. 3, which I see as B diminished seventh over a C pedal tone. I hear the left-hand Ab as the structural pitch and G as the decorative one.

I agree with m. 5. It's a pivot chord, serving as VI in the original key of C minor and bII in the upcoming (tonicized) G minor.

Bar 8 partially matches my analysis. I consider it a direct modulation (tonicization). That is, it's V the following F chord, but does not function in the key of G minor. To be a G minor chord, it would need to include Eb rather than E-natural. (Although the E natural could, perhaps, be attributed to melodic minor, the expectation would be that it move to F#, which it does not.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.