8

As a pop pianist I'm trying to understand the logic in the alberti bass modulation that sounds beautiful and "right" but the notes seem way off the diatonic scale of G maj.

The key signature is G major. K.545 2nd Movt Bar 3 the alberti bass line is GECE GECE then GC#A#C# (with a C# in the RH melodic line).

My thought process would be: B♭ instead of A# makes more sense (borrowing G min?) and where does the C# come from (D♭ maybe as an GB♭D♭ looks like a diminished triad).

So why GA#C# instead of GB♭D♭?

The next bar reverts to G maj alberti base so is this a case of adding leading notes?

4 Answers 4

8

This is a case where it's probably helpful to think of the passage melodically rather than harmonically.

Consider each note in the Alberti bass as a separate voice in a melodic line. In that case, starting on m. 3 beat 2, we have

  • E - C# - D in the top voice,
  • C - A# - B in the middle voice, and
  • G - G - G in the lowest voice.

Looked at this way, it's more clear that the C# and A# are serving leading-tone functions toward their respective notes. Notating with flats would suggest that the two pitches are "leading" downward rather than upward.

To analyze harmonically, the simplest explanation, IMO, is that the G-A#-C# chord is a "common-tone diminished chord" (G-Bb-Db), but spelled enharmonically to emphasize the upward movement of the resolution to G major.

3
  • Can you explain how the melody works against the Go chord? And is it Go or rather A#o7? May 28 at 17:24
  • @user1079505 Go and A# contain the same notes (i.e., same keys on a keyboard), but spelled differently. I'm saying it's a Go chord, but it's spelled "incorrectly" because the sharp signs indicate that the notes will be resolving upward. Regarding your first question, please say a bit more about what you'd like to better understand.
    – Aaron
    May 28 at 18:06
  • 2
    @user1079505 the notes are spelled that way for the same reason Beethoven spells them that way in the minuet in G: it's not a diminished triad per se; they are chromatic lower neighbors to the third and fifth of the G major triad.
    – phoog
    May 28 at 18:15
5

Yes, 'adding leading notes' is a good way of thinking about it. Don't worry about excusing those notes by 'borrowing' or 'modal mixtures'. There's not even much point in trying to stick a chord-name label on them. He's just shifted all the upper notes down a semitone so he can bring them back up in the next bar. Think 'whammy bar' rather than 'harmony theory' :-)

enter image description here

0
2

You're focusing on that one bar, not on where it's going. If Mozart had followed that one bar with G-A-C (left hand), then the chromatic passing notes would have been written G-Bb-Db.

In other words: 1. it's a passing chord 2. its spelling is a function of where it passes to, not of any objective harmonic function.

0

This spelling makes sense even alone for these notes in fact preparing the G major in the next bar from below. Mozart could have remained on C major, but makes the whole thing more interesting. Then A# and C# would be the augemented 2nd and 4th of G major, which certainly is more at home in G major than a minor 3rd or a diminished 5th would be.

But we can even argue this spelling from theory: This chord can be seen as borrowing the dominant chord with small 9 of the associated mediant (b minor), which would be F#79b and provides the A# as leading tone into the B and the C# as regular fifth. You will see that this passage could very well resolve into B minor by having the bass resolve into an F# instead of remaining on the G.

The effect of this is of course subtle, as we do not get a strong cadence here, so this is perceived rather as a diminuition of the plagal cadence C - G (Mozart even has a parallel octave in the resolution between alto and melody).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.