2

Voice 1 accentuates the melody that's woven through the 8th-note pattern. I want the notes on the top staff the 'blend' together. I remember this being possible in older Sibelius versions, but I cannot seem to figure it out now. The only possible 'solution' so far is to manually change the X-coordinates of every note, which is way too tedious a process for the length of the piece. Any ideas how to do this?

a few bars, with two offset voices in the top staff

2
  • By "blend together" do you mean you want the note heads to align vertically (when possible)? Jun 20 at 12:58
  • @ElementsinSpace indeed. Or actually horizontally? Not sure how to describe it otherwise. I want the dotted quarter notes in voice 1 to share the note head of the first 8th note in every triplet in voice 2. They're on the same beat.
    – Sem
    Jun 20 at 13:31

1 Answer 1

2

This is reasonably easy to do, but does take a couple of stages. They are quick though, especially if using keyboard shortcuts.

Assuming you have used voices 1 and 2 in the top stave, follow the steps below.

  1. Select the passage you want to edit.
  2. Select all voice 2 notes (on Mac this is Shift-Opt-Cmd-2)
  3. Change these to voice 3 (on Mac this is Opt-3)
  4. Select all voice 1 notes (on Mac this is Shift-Opt-Cmd-1)
  5. Invert the stems so they point upwards (on Mac this is X)

This takes you from this...

enter image description here

...to this...

enter image description here

...in just a few seconds!

To give a bit more info about why and how this works: with Sibelius voices 1 and 3 can share note-heads with different values, but they default to having stems pointing in the same direction. As your voice 1 notes are all above the middle of the stave, you can get these notes pointing up simply by pressing X and the will all flip.

It's also worth noting that Sibelius defaults to the correct notation by default, where dotted and non-dotted notes don't share a note-head. However, although this is correct in theory, it is often not done in practice (classical guitar music springs to mind).

2
  • 1
    Correct notation is a flexible term. Not merging dotted and non dotted notes is sensible is many polyphonic cases, in cases such as this one (where a melody is accompanied by an uniform arpeggio or some other uniform figure (such as is typical in guitar literature) it is expected and correct to do so.
    – Lazy
    Jun 20 at 20:26
  • Also it concerns me that Sibelius (a piece of 600$ software (or now 200$ per year software)) does not properly support so many features that would be considered rather common in classical engraving. I guess this shows that Sibelius rather targets film score composers and not engravers/editors/publishers.
    – Lazy
    Jun 21 at 9:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.