I've searched high and low for the meaning of the attached symbol but can't find the answer. Can you help me? The two horizontal Bars at the end of the line, some with a strike through.
-
1With a breve note, and others, one may wonder what the time signature of that piece could be.– TimCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 7:12
-
My guess is that the breve is in one voice and the 16ths are in a different voice, in a common signature (4/2?).– Greg MartinCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 15:37
Add a comment
|
3 Answers
It is one of several forms of the breve, double note, or double whole note which, as its name suggests, has twice the duration of a semibreve or whole note. The three forms commonly used in modern engraving are shown below. The square form is more common before the middle of the 20th century.
The reason some are "struck through" is the same reason any other note is: the note's pitch is indicated by centering it vertically on either a line or a space on the staff (or, as in this case, on a ledger line above or below the staff).
Because this note is on the first ledger line below the staff, it could be any of the following, roughly in decreasing order of probability:
- C4, middle C, in treble clef
- E2 in bass clef
- D3 in alto clef
- B2 in tenor clef
- A3 in soprano clef
- G2 in baritone clef
- F3 in mezzo-soprano clef
- C2 in sub-bass clef
- E4 in French violin clef
Or, if you prefer, in decreasing order of pitch:
- E4 in French violin clef
- C4, middle C, in treble clef
- A3 in soprano clef
- F3 in mezzo-soprano clef
- D3 in alto clef
- B2 in tenor clef
- G2 in baritone clef
- E2 in bass clef
- C2 in sub-bass clef
It could also be any of those with a chromatic alteration because of an accidental or because of the key signature.
Another possibility is that it is a part for tenor voice written in octave-transposed treble clef, in which case it is C3 or some chromatic alteration thereof. Other octave transpositions are possible, for example if it comes from a piccolo part or a contrabass or contrabassoon part, but this is an increasingly distant digression from the actual question, so I'll stop with that.
It is indeed a breve - twice as long as a semibreve, which is the 'standard' length of note needed to fill a bar of 4/4.
Ironically, it was the shortest note used long ago - longer ones, such as the longa were in constant use. Now hardly ever used, as the time signature would need to be 8/4 at least. I say at least, looking at the example, which appears to have even more notes preceding it within the same bar. Changing the tempo of a piece would obviate use of breves, so their use has declined to almost nothing.
-
1Originally, it was the shorter of only two durations, whence the names "long" and "short." Only later were maxima and semibreve added, and it was a long downhill ride from there. Good point on the preceding notes without a barline; it's a bit puzzling. Up until Brahms, at least, it was not unusual to write pieces "alla breve" (with C-slash time signature) but with four beats in a measure, so 4/2 instead of 8/4. I expect that 4/2 is much more common than 8/4, at least in that period.– phoogCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 8:20
-
Also, in the original context, a breve could be half as long as a longa or one-third as long, though it makes more sense to say that a longa could be composed of two or three breves: both durations could be found in the same piece of music. The 3-breve long was called "perfect," meaning "complete," and the other "imperfect," meaning "incomplete." When shorter durations were invented, they too could be perfect or imperfect depending on context. When this became confusing, people started indicating perfect notes with ... wait for it ... a dot placed after the note.– phoogCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 9:09
-
@phoog - so basically, a longa was longa than a breve! 'When this became confusing' - probably the very first time it was used, I'd say.– TimCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 10:12
-
@phoog - Now I'm wondering when double-dotted note notation was first made to mean "note is 1.75 times as long as indicated". Commented Sep 7, 2022 at 10:26
-
@Dekkadeci good question. It's probably after the mensural two- or threefold ambiguity disappeared, undotted notes could only ever be divided in two (I think shortly before the regular use of bar lines arose with the development of meter around 1600), and the dot came to be seen as "add one of the next smaller value" or indeed "extend this note such that the following note is halved in value." Then the double dot follows logically. I would guess this happened in the very late 17th century or early 18th.– phoogCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 10:45
That is a double whole-note on either middle C or bass E, depending on the clef. Double whole-notes last the length of two whole notes.
Wikipedia has an article with additional details: Double whole note
-
-
1@phoog The Wikipedia article isn't explicit, but is suggestive of "breve" and "double note".– AaronCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 4:33
-
@phoog An article on symbols.com (symbols.com/symbol/double-whole-note-or-breve) indicates double whole note in the US and breve everywhere else.– AaronCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 4:34
-
1@phoog -since it's twice as long as a semibreve, it will be a breve in just about anywhere but USA, although not much music is written with bars long enough to support it.– TimCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 7:10
-
5@Tim I believe the US terminology is also dominant in Canada. But maybe they just humo(u)r us by using our "wholesome" terminology when we're around and secretly use "crotchety" terminology when they're by themselves and with everyone else.– phoogCommented Sep 7, 2022 at 8:18