7

This is my first time on here and my first question! I'm currently preparing music for a rehearsal and recording session and want my charts to be easy and clear to read with out any problems. I have a tune in 6/4 and am a little unsure of what looks best or if there's a rule when it comes to quarter note off beats in 6/4. There's 2 examples, top is "Tied" and bottom is "quarter note"

Any help would be great!! enter image description here enter image description here

Improve this question
3
  • I’m not an expert but I personally prefer the second by a long way. If you have a reason to do the first, I strongly suggest breaking the beams also… although I guess I’m not sure the best way to break them.
    – Todd Wilcox
    Jan 16 at 13:04
  • Thanks mate! Yes I agree after looking at them both.
    – Jazzer Caster
    Jan 16 at 13:07
  • And you mean breaking the beams as in not having them beamed with 5 8th notes? I'll see if that can be done in Sebelius.
    – Jazzer Caster
    Jan 16 at 13:08

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
4

In both cases showing the 4th beat with an imaginary bar line is the way to go. You did it at times but not consistently. The beamed 8ths look strange with the ties. If you want to use ties like in the top example show every beat like in my circled correction, otherwise there is no real reason to beam them. The bottom one is cleaner and players are not going to complain about off beat quarter notes if they can see beat 4. Bar 34 also needs the same correction.

enter image description here

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Awesome mate, thanks so much, I've made these edits and it's looking heaps better!
    – Jazzer Caster
    Jan 17 at 0:04
  • @JazzerCaster It's helpful to the site if you "accept" the answer you found most helpful by clicking the check mark to the left of that post.
    – Aaron
    Jan 17 at 19:08
4

Neither of your solutions is optimal although the second one is better.
In 6/4 the middle of the bar (i.e. between the third and fourth quarter) should be visible. So you should take your second solution and split the B in the first bar with a tie (as in your first version). Similarly for the C in the second bar and the B-flats in the fourth. The third bar is already good.

Also, don't forget to give the sax player a transposed part.

Improve this answer
1
  • Great, thanks so much for that, I've got a quite a lot more of this in my sibelius file to correcr now, just having to go back through it now and I might post it once I'm done.
    – Jazzer Caster
    Jan 16 at 14:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.