If a producer remixes (b) a musical piece (a) by another producer, they are often (in my experience) accredited as follows:
Original Producer - Original Title (a) (Remixing Producer's Remix (b))
Let's assume that the remix (b) contains both recognizable sounds from the original piece (a), as well as incorporates new sounds unique to this remix (b).
If a producer would be inspired by the sounds unique to the remix (b), and would like to make a remix (c) of that, how would accreditation play out, provided that the resulting remix (c) would be based on sounds from both (a) and (b)?
In my experience, it would be like:
Original Producer - Original Title (a) (Remixing Producer's Remix (c))
But this would not give proper credit to sound elements created by the producer of remix (b). However, I have never seen accrediting like this:
Original Producer - Original Title (a) (Remixing Producer's Remix (b)) (Remixing Producer's Remix (c))
This seems clunky and unclear.