For practical purposes, lets assume a limited harmonic series.
How many harmonics are a fifth? How many a minor third? And so on.
What intervals are commonly found in the harmonic series? What intervals are under represented?
Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.Visit Stack Exchange
Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for musicians, students, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
The harmonic series extends to infinity, so we need to limit the analysis to the first n harmonics. The results, then, will depend on how many harmonics you analyze and how much value you give to each harmonic (maybe weight each harmonic with its amplitude).
I made a small program that analyses that relationship between harmonics and intervals. You can find it here. It has these specifications:
1 / harmonic number, so each harmonic gets a value depending on its amplitude in relation to the fundamental.
2^(1/12)(12-tone equal temperament) and Just Intonation (Pythagorean Tuning) to calculate the frequency of the intervals.
Let's see the results for the first 50 harmonics analyzed with this program. There are two tables: the first one shows the frequency each interval was found, the second one shows the weighted sum for each interval.
First 50 harmonics analyzed: (Results were the same in both 12-TET and Just Intonation) Ordered by total: fifth 7.0 root 6.0 tritone 6.0 major third 5.0 major second 4.0 minor third 4.0 minor sixth 4.0 minor seventh 4.0 minor second 3.0 fourth 3.0 major seventh 3.0 major sixth 1.0 Ordered by weighted total: root 1.97 fifth 0.688 major third 0.399 minor seventh 0.284 tritone 0.247 major second 0.223 minor sixth 0.175 major seventh 0.132 minor third 0.132 minor second 0.119 fourth 0.0947 major sixth 0.037
We can see that the most common intervals found in the harmonic series are unison and perfect fifth. The less common intervals found in the harmonic series are the major sixth, major seventh, and perfect fourth.
The weighted values give similar results, the difference is that the perfect fourth scores even lower. I wonder if there is a better weighting value or dynamic? I might be giving too little value to the higher harmonics.
Differences between harmonics and their closest interval.
Someone commented that it would be interesting to know what is the difference between the harmonics and their closest interval. After some modifications to the program, here are the results:
Average difference for the first 50 harmonics, in cents:
Average difference: Interval 12-TET JI root 0.000 0.000 minor second 18.879 22.138 major second 14.148 12.193 minor third 24.028 24.474 major third 16.762 21.454 fourth 23.319 22.667 tritone 35.395 32.136 fifth 11.703 10.306 minor sixth 33.950 33.950 major sixth 5.865 0.000 minor seventh 30.775 28.820 major seventh 22.833 26.091
Complete list of differences for the first 50 harmonics, in cents:
Differences for 12-TET: root ['0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '0.000'] minor second ['4.955', '46.727', '4.955'] major second ['3.910', '3.910', '44.860', '3.910'] minor third ['2.487', '48.656', '2.487', '42.483'] major third ['13.686', '13.686', '13.686', '13.686', '29.062'] fourth ['29.219', '29.219', '11.518'] tritone ['48.682', '48.682', '28.274', '48.682', '9.776', '28.274'] fifth ['1.955', '1.955', '1.955', '1.955', '34.493', '1.955', '37.652'] minor sixth ['40.528', '27.373', '40.528', '27.373'] major sixth ['5.865'] minor seventh ['31.174', '31.174', '31.174', '29.577'] major seventh ['11.731', '11.731', '45.036'] Differences for Just Intonation: root ['0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '0.000'] minor second ['14.730', '36.952', '14.730'] major second ['0.000', '0.000', '48.770', '0.000'] minor third ['3.378', '42.791', '3.378', '48.348'] major third ['21.506', '21.506', '21.506', '21.506', '21.242'] fourth ['27.264', '27.264', '13.473'] tritone ['36.952', '36.952', '40.004', '36.952', '1.954', '40.004'] fifth ['0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '0.000', '36.448', '0.000', '35.697'] minor sixth ['48.348', '19.553', '48.348', '19.553'] major sixth ['0.000'] minor seventh ['27.264', '27.264', '27.264', '33.487'] major seventh ['21.506', '21.506', '35.261']
Technically speaking, the answer is infinity for all intervals.
This is because for any resonant harmonic of a fundamental, a harmonic exists at twice the frequency.
There is an order in which these intervals appear, and that is easily found by looking at the harmonic series. You do need to know, of course, that the 12-tone equal temperament that we use today is derived from the harmonic series by adjusting all of the pitches so that they are an equal distance apart, and the notes in the harmonic series quickly decrease in size until they are less than a semitone apart.
I'm really not satisfied with the idea of using a 12-TET/common practice definition of "interval" when discussing the harmonic series. With the exception of the octave, all intervals created by the harmonic series must be adjusted to conform to an interval name (like "minor 7th") that is common usage. The correct way to refer to acoustic intervals is by way of a ratio, relating the harmonic to the fundamental. When thinking of it this way, the harmonic series is incredibly simple. Let's build a harmonic series on 100 Hz:
(P = partial --
harmonic frequency is always
fundamental frequency x
P | Hz | Interval 1 | 100 | 1/1 2 | 200 | 2/1 3 | 300 | 3/1 4 | 400 | 4/1 5 | 500 | 5/1 6 | 600 | 6/1 7 | 700 | 7/1 8 | 800 | 8/1 9 | 900 | 9/1
In order to find octave equivalences, we halve each interval ratio (causing a halving of the resulting frequency) until it is less than 2/1. (Mathematically, this just means we double the "denominator" of the interval.)
P | Hz | Interval 1 | 100 | 1/1 2 | 200 | 2/2 3 | 300 | 3/2 4 | 400 | 4/4 5 | 500 | 5/4 6 | 600 | 6/4 7 | 700 | 7/4 8 | 800 | 8/8 9 | 900 | 9/8
P | Hz | Interval 1 | 100 | 1/1 2 | 200 | 1/1 3 | 300 | 3/2 4 | 400 | 1/1 5 | 500 | 5/4 6 | 600 | 3/2 7 | 700 | 7/4 8 | 800 | 1/1 9 | 900 | 9/8
I included the middle step so it is easier to see that the number of intervals per octave grows exponentially: 2^n, where n is the number of octaves above the fundamental. Every next octave contains all the previous octave's intervals plus 2^(n-1) new intervals.
So, within a finite range of complete octaves and after simplifying all interval ratios, any interval with denominator 2^n is going to have:
It should be fairly easy from this point to create a generalized case for frequency of occurrence given an interval and a range, should you desire.
So, that's how the harmonic series works acoustically and mathematically. If you know how the harmonic series looks tonally, you should be able to match up the ratios listed above with your favorite tonal intervals: 3/2 is the perfect 5th, 5/4 is your major third, 7/4 is the minor 7th, and 9/8 is the major 2nd.
Personally, I don't believe any intervals beyond these should be considered "equivalent" beyond what coincidentally may be the case. Sure, you can get a "minor 3rd" by shooting up to the 19th harmonic, but it's much easier to derive using the distance between the 5th and 6th harmonics instead. Just Intonation uses exactly this for the minor third, 6/5. The perfect fourth is 4/3, major 6th is 5/3, and minor 6th is 8/5. Small whole-number ratios are perceived as consonance.
JC's program goes through and counts, which is one approach to the problem that certainly gives an answer. But what it doesn't provide is insight into the pattern that causes notes repeat in the overtone sequence. I'm going to take the opposite approach, of showing the pattern, without necessarily giving an answer. :)
The key, of course, is octaves, which occur whenever the frequency doubles. If we define units so that the fundamental frequency is '1', then the frequency of the harmonics are simply the integers. But any power of 2 will be some number of octaves above the fundamental:
unison/octaves: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, ...
In fact, any even numbered harmonic is a repeat of a previously-heard note, since it can be divided in half to find a harmonic one octave lower. So only odd numbers will give us 'new' notes, and every harmonic can be written as an odd number times a power of two.
The next available number in sequence is 3, which in the harmonic series corresponds to a perfect fifth:
fifths: 3, 6, 12, 24, ...
Next is the 5th harmonic, which corresponds to an interval of a major 3rd:
major thirds: 5, 10, 20, 40, ...
Then the 7th harmonic, corresponding to an out-of-tune minor 7th:
minor sevenths: 7, 14, 28, ...
And the 9th harmonic, corresponding to a major 9th (or a major 2nd):
major seconds: 9, 18, 36, ...
The 11th harmonic is another one that's out of tune with 12TET, lying somewhere between a tritone and a perfect fourth:
tritones: 11, 22, ...
From this point on, the harmonics correlate increasingly poorly to the 12TET scale, and need to start being rounded, per JC's program. But you can see the pattern here. If, for example, we're limited to the first 40 harmonics, then all the odd harmonics between 11 and 19 will occur twice (19x2 = 38), and beginning with harmonic 21, they will only occur once. Just to reiterate the point from earlier: every odd harmonic will be a totally new pitch in the series, and will not be an octave of a previous pitch.
Another way to think about harmonics is in terms of a prime number decomposition (every composite number is a product of primes). For example, consider the 60th harmonic: 60 = 2^2 * 3 * 5
Since there are two factors of '2', this is two octaves above harmonic 15 (= 3 * 5). Since there is a factor of '3', this is a perfect fifth above harmonic 5, which is a major third. So we can deduce that harmonic 60 is a major 3rd above a perfect 5th, i.e. a major 7th.