3

I have the following in my measure:

enter image description here

What would I have to write, to have those <c e>'s connected with beam instead of 1/8 rests, and those in second voice bellow also?

Edit

upper voice : <c' e>8[ r8 <c e>] r8 | lower voice : r8 g[ r8 g] | ,did connect them:

enter image description here

however, I am not shure if those rests should still be there in between?

6
  • 1
    Just to clarify - do you want a beam between the c/e as they are, with the rest still in between? So the actual music isn't changing - just adding a beam?
    – Chris
    Sep 21, 2014 at 13:21
  • see my edit please..
    – branquito
    Sep 21, 2014 at 13:25
  • I'm still confused by what your question is I'm afraid! Your edit is perfectly valid music - if that's what you mean?
    – Chris
    Sep 21, 2014 at 13:26
  • Ok, now please tell me do I have to do this always like this manually, or is there some kind of override which would apply this kind of style for a few measures?
    – branquito
    Sep 21, 2014 at 13:30
  • 1
    I'm not sure myself, sorry!
    – Chris
    Sep 21, 2014 at 13:34

1 Answer 1

4

The Auto_beam_engraver does not beam over rests, bar lines, manual beams or breathing signs.

The Notation Reference is quite explicit regarding the beaming across rests: "Beams must be entered manually if beams are to be extended over rests."

2
  • So you are suggesting I should do it manually every time I need it like that?
    – branquito
    Sep 21, 2014 at 21:05
  • @branquito Yes. Jul 9, 2021 at 9:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.