29

I've always wondered why almost every piano's lowest note is an A. In fact, I've never seen a piano whose lowest note is not an A, and I have also noticed that this pattern only occurs in pianos; most keyboards I've seen have a C or a G as lowest note.

This question's top voted answer touches this subject, but doesn't give a reason as to why the lowest key on almost any piano is an A.

Possible answers I could think of is that it's because of certain history, harmonics, convenience, compatibility with other instruments, or sheer coincidence.

  • 4
    Because it's extremely useful to have instrument ranges standardized, so you don't have to specify "for German-keyboard piano" / "for French-keyboard piano" etc, but simply "for piano". – Kilian Foth Feb 10 '15 at 15:59
  • 1
    It has been standardised, but throughout the development of the piano in the 19th century, there was a tendency to extend the range upwards and downwards. A0 is about 7.5 Hz north of the lower limit of hearing, so it's plenty low. The tendency to extend is still there, however: boesendorfer.com/en/model-290-imperial.html. – user16935 Feb 10 '15 at 18:01
  • 2
    Beethoven's pianos only went down to the F0, and you can often see him writing around the limitation, leaving out E0 in a place where he obviously wanted to put one, for example. – BobRodes Feb 11 '15 at 1:02
  • 1
    @BobRodes I think you mean "F1", "F0" would be below A0. – jjmusicnotes Feb 11 '15 at 13:16
  • 2
    All the notes lower than that are in the boite diabolique. – Micah Feb 12 '15 at 4:36
18
+200

Early pianos started out with the existing range of harpsichords, having between four and five octaves, usually starting at low C. This stands to reason, because Bartolomeo Cristofori, generally credited with being the inventor of the piano, was an expert harpsichord maker. By the time of Mozart, the range had standardized to five octaves, starting with the F below low C, a sixth above the bottom A on modern pianos.

Beethoven's favorite piano was the Broadwood "fortepiano", of which many replicas exist and on which performances of Beethoven's music are often heard. For reference, I will mention that, in school after hearing a performance of some of Beethoven's sonatas on such a replica, four piano students and the pianist took the legs off of it and lifted it into the back of the pianist's van. Not the same instrument as we have today!

Now, Beethoven wasn't always happy with the limitations of the keyboard range. There are all sorts of famous examples in his sonatas of his working around these limitations, leading to scholarly arguments on whether it's ok to add in some of the notes that he left out in performance. (Here's an interesting article on the subject.) The pianos kept adding keys during Beethoven's life, extending from five to seven octaves by 1820 or so, and some of his later work incorporates some of the new notes. So, it can be argued that Beethoven provided at least some of the impetus to expand the range beyond that current in his lifetime.

Eventually the range stabilized at what we have in the present. Part of the reason we don't have higher notes is that the strings would have to be too short to accommodate the requirements of the action. Also, at the higher end of our audible spectrum, it's difficult to distinguish between pitches, so perhaps part of the reason is that further extension probably wouldn't yield much musical value anyway.

On the low end, the impetus to expand the range slowed down as we began to get to the low end of the audible spectrum. The low end of the audible spectrum is generally said to be somewhere between 15 and 20 Hz. Now, the lowest A on the modern piano is about 27.5 Hz, which is getting close to the edge of our ability to hear. Adding nine notes on the biggest Bösendorfer gets the lowest note down to 16.5 Hz, which can be barely heard if at all by most people.

In the very low notes, most (if not all) of what can be heard is actually the overtones of the note. That's why they sound a bit "muddy". The existence of lower notes than are generally used adds to the resonance of higher notes, so that's also one of the reasons that we have them.

To demonstrate this, here are two examples from piano literature that actually use the lowest A. The first one is Debussy's Isle Joyeuse, and the note occurs on the last note of the piece. Skip to the end, and if you listen to it, you'll notice that the note itself is a bit unclear. You know what note it is partly from the context of the rolled chord--the chord tells you where it's going, if you will.

The next one is Brahms' Rhapsody Op. 79 No. 2. Look at the last quarter note in the second measure, and even more strikingly on the next page, second line, last measure where the fermata is. You'll notice that the doubling of the A with the next octave up gives it more of an "A feeling" than you have in the Debussy piece.

So, to sum up my answer: pianos have evolved to the point where the pitch range is pushing the envelope of useful pitches, given the limits of audible range, how we hear pitch, and the nature of the piano tone. The two largest Bösendorfer models notwithstanding, adding more keys to the piano doesn't add much in the way of usable musical materials.

  • This is all well and good, but certainly there must have, at some point in history, been set a standard for pianos to end at the lowest note of A. Indeed, lower notes, as you have stated, would not have carried much musical significance as they became inaudible, but this does not explain why the piano makers did not simply end at, say, B. Perhaps, it has more to do with the first piano with 88 keys, which became popular and thus set a standard for other piano designs to follow suite. Maybe we can find the history of such a first piano. – nine9 Jan 22 '16 at 8:07
  • 1
    I think it probably comes down to A being the first letter of the alphabet. The first pianos with A at the bottom had a seven-octave range, with A at the top as well, making 85 keys. – BobRodes Jan 25 '16 at 2:12
  • What is "low C"? See, this is why I asked this question: music.stackexchange.com/questions/39831/… ;) – Mr. Boy Jan 27 '16 at 10:09
  • 1
    "Low C" is the C two octaves below middle C. In this system, "Bass C" is the C an octave below middle C, "Treble C" is the C an octave above middle C, and "High C" is an octave above that. So, "Tenor High C" is simply the "High C" in the "octave treble clef" or "vocal tenor clef", which is a clef that tenors use where the notes as written in the treble clef are an octave lower. So, the "tenor high C" is actually a "treble C", the C one octave above middle C. – BobRodes Jan 29 '16 at 1:41
16

You must not have heard of the Bösendorfer Imperial 290 piano, which has 9 extra notes lower than "A", for a total of 97 keys. The soundboard is 2.9 meters in length. It is a popular model in large churches and concert halls, but it is very expensive at around €150.000. It has been on the market for more than 100 years. The Bösendorfer company is in Vienna, Austria.

enter image description here

enter image description here

For 100 years, Bösendorfer has owned the market for anybody who has a special need for a piano that goes below the conventional low "A".

The existence of the Bösendorfer 290 and its 100 years of success proves that there is no technical reason that the conventional low "A" is some kind of limitation that cannot be overcome. However, to the best of my knowledge, no other piano company has ever mass-produced another model of piano with notes lower than the conventional low "A".

The obvious reasons why all other piano manufacturers stop with the low "A" are that economic factors would make it impractical for them to copy what Bösendorfer has succeeded in doing. It seems to be that developing the tooling to manufacture such a huge piano would be too expensive, that the pianos would have to cost a great deal of money, and that there would be a limited number of people willing to buy them.

Furthermore, as the standard low "A" has been established for about 150 years, there are virtually no compositions that call for a note lower than the low "A". I suspect that composers have not written any music that calls for lower notes because those composers either did not have access to a Bösendorfer 290, or that they realized that it was unlikely that other musicians wishing to buy the sheet music and perform those compositions would have access to a Bösendorfer 290 upon which to play them.

  • 5
    This answers a different question, I believe. – Meaningful Username Feb 11 '15 at 12:03
  • @MeaningfulUsername, I have modified my answer to make my point more clearly. – user1044 Feb 11 '15 at 15:44
  • I know Liszt wrote something that calls for the E0, but can't find it. I don't suppose anyone else has it? – BobRodes Feb 12 '15 at 4:40
  • 3
    @BobRodes: According to Don Byrd's Extremes of Conventional Music Notation, Bartok wrote a piano sonata calling for an F0, but that's the lowest example listed there. – Michael Seifert May 6 at 13:36
8

When the piano was invented it did not have 88 keys and did not start on A. As composers such as Beethoven starting composing music that demanded a wider range of available notes, piano makers of the day responded by building piano's with an expanded range.

The precursor of the piano was the harpsichord which was not the first keyboard (the organ was invented prior to the harpsichord). Very early keyboard instruments did not have black keys and therefore were not chromatic. The early harpsichords and the pianos that evolved from them only spanned four octaves and started on a C. This is probably due to the first keyboards having only white keys so they worked in the key of C or A minor.

Here is a quote from this article Fascinating Facts ... pianos ... 88 keys?

According to piano historian and registered piano technician Stephen H. Brady, medieval stringed instruments originally included only the white keys of the modern keyboard, with the raised black keys added gradually: “The first fully chromatic keyboards [including all the white and black keys] are believed to have appeared in the fourteenth century.”

Before there were 88 key pianos the 85 key piano starting on A became the norm. From the same article quoted above:

Michael Moore, of Steinway & Sons, theorizes that it was a combination of artistic expression and capitalism that gave rise to the 88- key piano. Great composers such as Mozart were demanding instruments capable of expressing the range of the music they were creating. Other composers piggybacked on the expanded range provided by the bigger, “modern” pianos. Piano makers knew they would have a competitive advantage if they could manufacture bigger and better instruments for ambitious composers, and great changes were in store between 1790 and 1890, as Stephen Brady explains: By the end of the eighteenth century, toward the end of Mozart’s career and near the beginning of Beethoven’s, piano keyboards had reached six full octaves, and a keyboard compass of six and a half octaves was not uncommon in early nineteenth-century grands. For much of the middle to late nineteenth century, seven full octaves (from lowest A to highest A) was the norm.

Okay - so now we know why the piano keyboard grew larger over time.

EDIT: And Wheat Williams did a great job (in his new answer) explaining how the technology of piano building evolved to make this expansion possible in order to meet the demand & desire for more notes.

But why did the piano builders all decide to start making the first key on the keyboard an A? Was it arbitrary? Was it a result of limitations of human hearing or engineering? Or was there some logic applied to the decision to start with A?

None of them are around to tell us for absolute certain - and whoever they told when they were alive apparently did not write it down. So all I can do is offer a very logical reason why starting with A became the accepted norm.

When the concept of assigning letter names to identify musical notes was presented in the first century, it only made sense to start with A as the name of the first note. This naming of notes using letters predates the building of many instruments.

Eventually the note that was identified by the letter name A became common to the tuning of most (if not all) stringed instruments. Thus the A note became the reference note for tuning of all modern instruments in an orchestra.

In the early days of keyboard instruments, there was no standardized universal tuning reference that was adhered to. An organ in one church may have been tuned to a different pitch than one across the street.

Along about the same time in history that piano builders started expanding the range of their pianos, there came a coordinated effort to standardize musical pitch. From a Wikipedia article on "Concert Pitch" -

the French government passed a law on February 16, 1859, which set the A above middle C at 435 Hz.[2] This was the first attempt to standardize pitch on such a scale, and was known as the diapason normal. It became quite a popular pitch standard outside France as well, and has also been known at various times as French pitch, continental pitch or international pitch

Piano tuners of the day (in the absence of modern digital tuners) used tuning forks which were tuned to A.

They started with the A above middle C (which is what the tuning fork was tuned to sound) and tuned the other A notes using octaves. The 85 key piano became the standard before the modern 88 key piano did. There are still some old 85 key pianos around. The 85 key piano that was adopted by the piano makers of the day as the standard configuration spanned seven octaves and started on A0 and the last key was A7.

This is very logical from a practical point of view given that the piano tuners of that time started with a tuning fork tuned to A = 435 Hz (this was later changed and now is A=440 Hz) and then tuned the other A's by ear using octaves.

So it stands to reason that if we were going to build a piano with an extended range that satisfied the composers of the day and wanted to span 7 octaves (close to the limits of humans ability to distinguish notes) and if we knew that to tune that piano we would be starting with a tuning fork tuned to A above middle C and work from there - it only makes sense that we would go as far as we could in both directions to cover most of the effective range for human hearing. And to do that it makes the most sense to proceed in octaves for the sake of simplifying the tuning process.

If we start in the middle on A and expand from there in both directions, we end up with a keyboard that starts and ends on A. So there you have it!

Later the 3 keys were added to the end (to end on C) perhaps to complete the C major scale on the last octave.

  • 1
    That's a good point about the reason that we used A as the lowest note rather than G or B or whatever. It didn't occur to me that it was the first letter of the alphabet! – BobRodes Jan 21 '16 at 1:59
  • @BobRodes - I am sure there was some logical thought put into it. I don't buy that A0 is the lowest note most humans can hear or that it was the lowest note that piano strings of the day could reproduce (although that is possible but would not preclude choosing B0 or C0 as the first key). And I don't believe it was random or arbitrary as some have suggested. – Rockin Cowboy Jan 21 '16 at 2:12
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. – Dom Jan 21 '16 at 23:47
7

The fact that a piano can go down to low "A" depended entirely upon the railroad and shipbuilding industries of the 1800s. It had little to do with the wishful thinking of artistic considerations. Read on and I will explain.

I had so many comments to make that I decided I needed to add another answer. @RockinCowboy cited one lone source that implied that the expansion of the range of the notes on the piano was in response to the desires of composers for artistic reasons. I don't agree. Google history of piano and you will find many sources that paint an entirely different picture. You will find many timelines listing technological innovations by builders. You won't see much of anything said about what the composers wanted or requested.

This can be clearly seen: For centuries harpsichords were made of only a wooden frame, and the only available material for strings was plain brass wire. The range of notes stayed the same, at 4-1/2 to 5 octaves. Even the invention of the piano could not go beyond that. The earliest pianofortes in the 1720s had a plain wooden frame strung with plain brass wire, and the same 5-octave range as the harpischord. They stayed that way for almost another century.

I'm sure that composers in Bach's time wanted more notes on a keyboard, but it was practically speaking impossible to build a larger keyboard with more notes.

Harpsichords with a full 5 octaves had very long frames to accommodate the plain thin brass strings that had to be very long to play those low notes. The next innovation was to create wound bass strings -- a plain brass core around which another brass wire was wrapped. That helped a bit, but the wound brass strings were still too brittle for higher notes -- they would break. They still had poor vibrational properties for those lowest notes. Then there was the matter that a purely wood frame could not handle the additional string tension. At this time nobody knew how to build anything that would perform better.

No, the expansion to more than 5 octaves had to wait for the technological innovations in forging, casting, and drawing iron and steel on an industrial scale. These began to happen around 1810. The Industrial Age dawned. Vast foundaries and factories were developed to smelt iron and steel and cast it, and to build railroads and iron-clad battleships.

It was only from this point that the expansion of the number of notes on the piano was finally able to happen -- and it happened rapidly. It was as if a dam burst.

One innovation that came about this time was the invention and use of iron strings, but they were only tried for a short time, because iron strings corrode rapidly and don't produce a good tone. Later a tremendous breakthrough happened: the invention of carbon steel strings and wound steel strings. This enabled rapid innovation.

Read about the History of Piano Wire at Wikipedia. This will explain a great deal.

Around the same time, new technology for making cast iron bars came into play. Builders incorporated cast iron bar reinforcements into the wooden piano frame. In tandem with wound steel piano wire strings, it was now finally possible to build larger pianos with extra low and high notes.

The next huge leap forward was the invention of the solid cast-iron piano frame (sometimes called the plate or harp), which happened from the late 1820s (Chickering) into the early 1850s (Steinway). This enabled the piano design quickly to expand to its current 88 notes.

I found a great lecture online explaining the physical limitations faced by the first piano, Cristofori's invention of 1720, and how the cast-iron piano frame and steel piano wire strings had to be invented first to overcome these problems.

http://www.speech.kth.se/music/5_lectures/conklin/thecastiron.html

The ability to build a piano with 88 notes followed after the development of factories that built out railroads that criss-crossed the world, and shipyards that built iron-clad battleships. If you don't believe this, the only other possible explanation would be that the railroad and the shipbuilding industries were dependent upon and got their technology from piano manufacturers. This is obviously not the case.

There were many other technological details of the piano that had to be invented and refined and manufactured as well. These had to do with the action and mechanism of the hammers and the keys, which were mostly all wooden. But these innovations would have been of little use without wound steel piano wire and the cast-iron piano harp. That is why these innovations appeared alongside the appearance of iron and steel in piano-building, and not before.

As for why things stopped at low "A" for everybody but Bösendorfer, it's because of the hard limitations of the physics of the materials and the technologies that have been invented. None of this has substantially changed since about the 1870s. Physics is physics. The low "A" was the lowest note that was technologically feasible. It sounded good, and the piano-buying public was willing to pay for it. It hit the "sweet spot" between technology and commerce. Only one company in 125 years, Bösendorfer, was willing to go lower than that. Every other piano manufacturer found it unfeasible and commercially non-viable, and they still do to this day.

  • 1
    The Stuart and Sons grand piano has 102 keys - expanded at both ends. So Bösendorfer is NOT the only one. Good job explaining HOW they accomplished expanding the piano to meet the demands of the composers. The WHY is still based on demand. You say they stopped at A because of the limitations of the physics of the materials? That may have been a contributing factor but I don't think it explains why A - could have stopped on B or gone to G. I don't think it was arbitrary or based on going as low as they possibly could and it just happened that they just could not possibly go below A. – Rockin Cowboy Jan 20 '16 at 18:45
  • 1
    @RockinCowboy, I didn't say that they stopped at low "A" solely because of physics. I said it was the "sweet spot" of physics and technology and commerce, meaning popularity among the piano-buying public. Bösendorfer is still building 97-key 290 models, but I doubt that they make much money doing it. I suspect that their "regular" 88-key models earn the money; the rare 290 with its very high price is almost a prestige item. – user1044 Jan 20 '16 at 19:25
  • 1
    I have written to Stuart & Sons with questions and gotten a personal reply. They built their first 102-key model in 2009. They say that they were only able to achieve this when French builder Stephen Paulello made available a new technology in piano wire strings -- which goes to show that all of this history was driven by the technology of making strings above all else. – user1044 Jan 20 '16 at 21:52
  • It's quite amazing that the last innovation in the number of notes was the 97-key Bösendorfer in 1900, and it was not until 2009 that the latest innovation, the 102-key Stuart & Sons, was technologically possible. Contrast this with the rapid innovations in pianos between about 1812 and 1880. That shows that the technology went about as far as it could up until 1900 and then had to wait more than a century to go any further. – user1044 Jan 20 '16 at 21:54
  • It's not likely the 102 key piano will become popular because the extra notes are outside the hearing range of many people. Not to mention cost. – Rockin Cowboy Jan 20 '16 at 22:10
3

A0 is not chosen consciously but is just an arbitrary note as a result of natural selection through the ages of practice by composers, performers and makers. It seems lower A0 stands at the threshold for majority of composers and performers to express themselves comfortably, and for makers to build instruments efficiently.

Some points that should be considered are:

  • When the frequency goes lower and lower it becomes harder for human hearing to distinguish notes from each other and the notes starts to sound more percussive than melodic. That makes low frequency notes impractical for harmonic and melodic use.
  • It gets harder to stop lower notes on piano due to the high momentum caused by the increasing string weight and energy. After some point it is impossible to play bass notes without preventing notes blending into each other. Blending bass leaves no harmony, audible melody nor percussive rhythm behind.
  • Earlier pianos were more percussive with less sustain.
  • Existing low notes around A0 are used rarely for harmonic and melodic function in the piano literature.

Makers enhance their instruments to increase their capabilities but there is no point in investing time and effort on making them if no one is using it or the maker doesn't find the tone quality well enough. There is a custom made extended range version of almost all instruments (such as Octobass) but the ones used rarely became extinct or only the composers and performers with enough resources could afford them.

A comparison with an instrument with a narrower keyboard, harpsichord may help the discussion. Composers used the whole range of harpsichord extensively and for the same melodic and harmonic function as the other keys. Therefore composer's were limited due to technical limitations.

But for piano, composers usually save low notes for different tonal colors and special effects. It is not possible to make a consistent harmonic and melodic use out of low notes due to incapability of human hearing at that low frequencies. That's why I pointed out the percussive nature of low ranges. We tend to hear them as noise. Although different in pitch, in practice, one key functions similar to the key next to it. There is no point in ivesting more of them after some point. Surviving the ages, that balance point is apparently A0.

  • Could it be that the practice of composers was limited by the fact that A0 was the lowest note? I have to believe that some conscience thought was put into the decision to make the 85 key piano go A - A! Not arbitrary. And that same LOGIC was likely followed by the other piano makers leading to A to A becoming the norm until it was expanded later to high C. – Rockin Cowboy Jan 20 '16 at 18:50
  • @RockinCowboy I don't think so. What you said was true for harpsichord. Its whole range was used extensively and for the same melodic and harmonic function as the other keys. But for piano, low notes are already saved for special tonal colors and effects by the composers. It is not possible to make a consistent harmonic, melodic use out of them due to incapability of human hearing at that low frequencies. That's why I pointed out the percussive nature of low ranges. We tend to hear them as noise. One key functions similar to the key next to it in practice. There is no point having two of them. – Guney Ozsan Jan 24 '16 at 17:57
  • @RockinCowboy Because of that functional reason, not a great majority of the literature uses that range extensively to support the idea of composers limited by the range. It was true when technical limitations were more effective but piano is already a common instrument with that wide register. There are not so many orchestral instruments in that range either. So the case is not actually special to piano. (I'll enhance the answer with this discussion.) – Guney Ozsan Jan 24 '16 at 17:58
3

The reasons are partly historic, and partly connected with the sizes and design constraints of pianos. There is a compromise between storing enough energy to generate a strong, sustained tone, and having the overtones of the strings in tune with their fundamentals. [The problem is particularly onerous for pianos because they are percussion instruments].
There are a number of requirements for having overtones and fundamental in tune:
The straightforward way is for the restoring force on the string to be entirely due tension and for the bridges at the ends of the string to move a relatively small amount. Unfortunately the thicker strings that are needed to provide a strong sound are quite rigid, and the rigidity provides restoring force. This is physically exacerbated at low frequencies by the limited length of the strings on most pianos. The rigidity problem can be ameliorated by adding windings around the strings, but this has limited benefit at the lowest frequencies on the piano (approximately A, Bb and B). Theoretically one might compensate by winding the string in a suitably uneven fashion; however, I have yet to hear an instrument less than 9' long that delivered correct pitching for either the A or the Bb.
The problem is exacerbated by the reducing sensitivity of the ear aat low frequency: the beat notes between the harmonics are heared equally strongly to the fundamental; obviously this further degrades the perception of the quality of the low notes, and this doubtledd dicourages many attempts to further extend the range.
Bosendoefer and Stuart and Sons are two manufacturers that build large enough pianos to give pure bass sounds and that extend the range down to the E below the usual A.

  • Thanks for mentioning overtone tuning. – Guney Ozsan Apr 5 at 21:19
0

Yes. Everyone were talking about the evolution, human hearing range, etc., and they are all 100% correct!


However, there is still ONE REASON that no one has ever listed; and it is the most important reason why.

The reason why the piano normally starts on A while ends on C is because of the very, very strict and strong importance and usefulness of the key of A minor and C major.

The key of C major and A minor are the two of the most common keys in tonal music; and is the most common key that is used in various examples of harmonic theories. This is because they both have no sharps or flats. This means that if we play the key of A minor or C major on a piano or other keyboard instrument, we would usually play only white keys.

Here is Dom's comment that I have recently got in one of my posts:

C Major/ A minor are diatonic and do not have any accidentals. If you are suggesting chord with accidental they are not diatonic.

In fact, they share the same key signature - no sharps or flats. A pair of two keys that share the same key signature are called relative keys. One will be major, while the other will be minor. Therefore, C major and A minor are relative keys.

If we play on white keys, it is easier for us to play a large amount of notes more smoothly. This is because black keys are higher and farther than the whites. Therefore, if we play either only black keys or both whites and blacks, it becomes easier to play wrong notes; and it even causes a bigger chance of straining fingers as well!

Major keys have a brighter sound while minor keys sound darker. If you play C major on a piano, you can both play smoothly and have a bright sound. On the other hand, if you play the key of A minor, it becomes smooth, but dark.

High notes are to major keys as low notes are to minor keys. The highest note of a piano is a C, while lowest is an A. If you play C major, you are likely to play the highest note of a piano. If you play A minor, you are likely to play the lowest note of a piano. This means that it helps us to emphasize the mood of a piece we are playing, without straining our fingers or making mistakes. That is the most important reason why the piano starts with an A while it ends with a C.

  • It sounds like the whole piano literature was ignored. – Guney Ozsan Apr 5 at 21:19
-2

Because a G# down there is below the range of human hearing. You will only hear overtones and not the fundamental bass note.

In my experience, only rarely do I hear the fundamental bass note of the first few keys of the piano.

Possible explanations are:

The room is not large enough for the wave to develop

The piano itself is not large enough to acoustically resonate in a way that would amplify the fundamental to a level loud enough to hear

  • 11
    No, notes below the low "A" on a conventional 88-key piano are certainly not below the range of human hearing. See my answer. – user1044 Feb 11 '15 at 11:14
  • 2
    Yes and no. The average range of hearing is about 20 Hz - 20 kHz. Under laboratory conditions, some people can hear tones as low as 12 Hz. Ideal low A is 27.5 Hz; ideal low C on the Bösendorfer is about 16.7 Hz (in equal temperament), but pianos are usually stretched-tuned a bit to deal with the inharmonicities of the strings, which, in the bass, have some tendency to act like rods acoustically rather than strings, thus making for octaves that are slightly greater than 2:1. Admittedly the longer the piano, the less pronounced the inharmonicity, but there is always a little. (more...) – user16935 Feb 11 '15 at 17:21
  • 5
    So... Most people will not hear the fundamentals of the lowest notes of Bösendorfer's extensions; a fair number (especially with increasing age) will not hear the bottom notes of a conventional piano. These sub-bass notes come into their own as lower octave reinforcements of higher notes, much like 32' and (a fortiori) 64' stops on an organ. The upper partials are in most people's hearing range. – user16935 Feb 11 '15 at 17:28
  • 2
    I would say that the reason that you don't hear the fundamental is not so much that it is below the audible spectrum as that the overtones sound louder than the fundamental and tend to drown it out. It's hard for the ear to keep the pitch level from becoming indistinct at very low frequencies, especially with a note that has a lot of overtones. – BobRodes Feb 12 '15 at 2:45
  • 1
    +1 on the harmonics are louder than the fundamental that is probably the correct answer – Mike Jr Of-Britt Feb 12 '15 at 5:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.