On Mark Levine's Jazz Theory book, on Chapter Five, Slash Chords, it says:

Although triads can sound good in any inversion, all things being equal triads sounds strongest in second inversion.

Then there are some examples of slash chords, with C as the bass and all the major triads that can be played on top of it (1). All of them are in second inversion and then there is the aforementioned quote.

(1): enter image description here

But why do triads sound strongest in second inversion?

Edit: With slash chords, the author isn't referring just to inversions. The example above shows any major triad that can be played over a C note. For instance, the E/C refers to the Lydian Augmented chord, which can also be written as C maj7 #5.

  • 5
    Subjectivity. Mark Levine may think so, I don't. 1st inversion can sound strong as the tonic is on top. There's only 3 options, so why should one sound better, apart from to an individual?
    – Tim
    Commented Apr 1, 2015 at 21:09
  • 7
    @Tim 1st inversion does not mean that the tonic is on top. Inversions refer only to which member of the chord is in the bass. All inversions could have the tonic on top if you voice it that way. Commented Apr 1, 2015 at 21:24
  • 5
    For those interested, the relevant page can be seen on google books here: books.google.com/…. As @Chris surmised, this appears to be a glaring abuse of the traditional usage of the term "inversion", since it doesn't account for the bass note at all, and only refers to the R.H. voicing. Even more confusingly, he then uses the correct definition of inversion a few pages later, when he describes F/C as an F chord "in second inversion". Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 2:19
  • 3
    @MatthewRead OK, now I'm a bit mystified, there's clearly a terminological difference here that I've never encountered before. I'm not certain what RCM is, is it the Royal Conservatory of Music? What textbook are they getting this from? Kostka/Payne: "the inversion of a triad or seventh chord is determined only by what member of the chord is in the bass." Clen/Marv: "A voicing in which a chord member other than the root is the lowest-sounding pitch" Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 13:16
  • 3
    "Sometimes I think jazz is just an excuse to do everything wrong." = Dumbest thing on the site so far. Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 20:46

3 Answers 3


It should be mentioned that throughout the whole book there are three occurrences of the statement that triads sound stronger/strongest in second inversion:

  1. Ex. 1
  2. Ex. 2
  3. Ex. 3

If you look at the context in each of these cases you'll see that Levine always talks about slash chords. In Ex. 1 he talks about a Gsus4 (actually G9sus4) voiced as a F/G chord, where the F triad on top of the G bass note is in second inversion. Ex. 2 is a G/Eb chord, where Levine compares the root position and the second inversion of the G triad. Finally, Ex. 3 is the example stated in the OP with all possible major triads over a C bass note (all of them in second inversion).

So even though it sounds like a general statement, Levine actually always refers to the second inversion as the strongest only in the context of slash chords. And that's a different thing than talking about pure triads, where he might not even agree with that statement. The statement also makes more sense in the context of slash chords because we are already dealing with a different root, so the root position of the top triad does not anymore have its original special significance (as having the chord's root as the lowest note).

Furthermore, looking at the harmonic series for a C root (not bothering about octaves)

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
C C G C E G ...

we see that the second inversion G C E consists of lower harmonics (3 4 5) than the root position (4 5 6). I'm referring to close voicings here because that's what Levine means when he talks about the second inversion in all three examples. So one could argue that the second inversion in close voicing has some inherent stability IF the root of the triad loses its role due to the existence of another lower root, as is the case with slash chords.

  • So the OP was miss quoting him then?
    – Neil Meyer
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 18:48
  • 1
    @NeilMeyer: No, but if you add the context for all occurrences of that statement then it becomes clear that Levine always talks about slash chords with triads on top.
    – Matt L.
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 19:12

When Levine refers to a chord as being "stronger" is can also be read as "more stable", as in harmonically stable.

Take the C Major Triad as an example (C, E, G). If you analyze what the intervals are for each inversion (first and second) you can see the following:

First inversion; E is root under G and C

  • E,G = m3
  • E,C = m6
  • G,C = P4

Second inversion; G is root under C and E

  • G,C = P4
  • G,E = M6
  • C,E = M3

According to Paul Hindemith the intervals can be ranked from "strong" to "weak" like so:

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  11  12
P8, P5, P4, M3, M6, m3, m6, M2, m7, m2, M7, dim5

The P8 is strong, whereas the dim5 is weak.

Back to our example; first inversion contains intervals 6,7,3 (m3,m6,P4) while second inversion contains intervals 3,4,5 (P4,M3,M6). According to the interval ranking, second inversion is stronger because it contains more intervals that are towards the "strong" side of the ranked intervals.

Note that according to the interval ranking, a P5 is considered stronger than a P4. This means C,G will be more stable than G,C. Even though they are the same notes, the positioning of the notes determines what is called the order of Combination Tones (also known as Resultant Tones). The first resultant tone produced from a P5 is actually different from a P4.

I can't recall exactly what the notes are anymore; Hindemith maps it all out in his book "The Craft of Musical Composition: Book 1" (ISBN 0901938300).

  • 2
    But using that system the root would be the strogest as P5 and M3 come before P4 and M6
    – Dom
    Commented Apr 1, 2015 at 23:55
  • I was limiting my comparison to just first and second inversions; you're correct in that root position is the strongest for the reasons you cited. Nice job! Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 14:15

In general, when we say 2nd inversion we mean that the 5th of the chord is in the bass. However, the author is treating these slash chords as independent major chords superimposed over a C bass note. These particular chords are the ones in 2nd inversion regardless of the C note in the bass.

Moreover, in "close chord position" or "keyboard style" such as in the example, the only possibility of a chord in 2nd inversion would be: the 3rd note of the chord over the root, over the 5th.

Since the most characteristic notes of the triad (i.e. the root and the 3rd) are now in the top voices the result is a chord voicing with a "strong" character.

  • And how does that make the triad sound the strongest? Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 17:26
  • @Shevliaskovic I think the term "strongest" is debatable but I find this interpretation, of the tonic and third being on the top voices, to be the most obvious. Do they sound "stronger" relative to their root positions and their 1st inversions to you?
    – Chris
    Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 17:40
  • 1
    Oh, I see what Levine is saying now. Thanks for explaining it! Could you please flesh out your answer a little more, including the comment you added? Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 21:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.