Generally, in Blues and jazz, the oft-used tritone (C to F#/Gb) is referred to as a b5. Why is this a better term than #4? In the Blues scale, there will always be two notes of the same name, but why is b5 favoured? Possibly to match the b3 and b7?

  • I wouldn't say that b5 is favored in the spelling of the blues scale. Maybe you were looking at the blues scale descending? Anyway, it's perfectly valid to write #4 when describing the blues scale. – pepper Apr 25 '15 at 7:52
  • 3
    "tri-tone" = "three whole tones" above the reference pitch; this is only the case if it is an augmented fourth. – musarithmia Apr 25 '15 at 16:09

I think that in this (and most other) contexts the broad definition of the tritone makes sense, which says that a tritone is an interval spanned by six semi-tones. So with this definition both augmented fourth and diminished fifth qualify as a tritone.

Whether that note in the blues scale is written as a #4 or a b5 usually depends on the direction of the melody: #4 ascends, b5 descends. I believe that the reason why in the blues scale this note is more frequently called b5 is that the #4 is a very common note in many genres, and in many contexts it doesn't sound bluesy at all, e.g. if used melodically over a V/V chord (i.e. in C major over a D7 resolving to G7). Also take the lydian scale: it has a #4 but there's no blues character whatsoever. Unlike the #4, the b5 (descending) does have that bluesy character. So the blues character of that note is mainly perceived if it coexists with the unaltered 4, and then it would often descend to the 4 as a b5. Coexistence with the 5 (without an unaltered 4) does usually not generate any bluesy character (e.g., lydian).

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Interesting. When I play blues on guitar, I'm as likely to bend that note up to a 5 as I am to let it down to a 4. Yes, in Lydian it has a different function, and in 'standard' music, it's usually a #4, as in Stars & Stripes, used as a modulation. But I rarely hear it called a #4 in Blues. – Tim Apr 25 '15 at 10:27
  • 1
    @Tim: Yes, but I'm pretty sure you bend it up from the 4, so I believe it's that coexistence with the 4 that makes for that bluesy sound. – Matt L. Apr 25 '15 at 10:34
  • @jjmusicnotes - that's more likely to be the chord, with a 7th inc. at least. I'm trying to establish the note itself. Can't see blues players thinking of it as a #11 note. – Tim Apr 25 '15 at 14:21

To be 100% exact to the name 'tritone', it would be #4. Because, if we ascend 3 tones from the root, we have #4, and not b5. The three tones would be C-D, D-E, E-F#.

Although, from what I have understood, it depends on the progression. Usually, the #4/b5 tritone would descend a semitone.

For instance, a common progression would be Gb7-F (maj7 or 7). Since we are in F major, a cadence like F#7-Fmaj7 is really rare (not that it doesn't exist).

The most common use of the tritone is on the tritone substitution of the V7 chord, with the bII7 chord. It wouldn't be nice to see #I 7.

But to sum up, I don't think any of the two names is wrong. You can use whichever suits you better.

| improve this answer | |
  • I'm thinking more in terms of note names as they're used far more - a blues often only consists of the three main chords - I, IV and V. – Tim Apr 25 '15 at 8:32
  • Your intent is good here, but a little short-sighted. A "tritone" is equidistant from a root in both directions, so you're only half-correct. If you descend from C, the three intervals would be C-Bb, Bb-Ab, Ab-Gb. A tritone is both Gb and F#, it entirely depends on the context of the music to determine how it should be written. – jjmusicnotes Apr 25 '15 at 14:12
  • @jjmusicnotes - yes, you're right, but somehow it seems to get called the b5 in blues, but why? – Tim Apr 25 '15 at 14:22
  • 1
    @Tim It very likely comes from the spelling of a half-diminished chord, which is only an altered 5th away from a minor-7th chord, a chord often found in jazz / blues. Follow the flats -> C7, Cm7, Cm7b5, Cdim7. It's a natural progression. You see 5's instead of fours because most blues / jazz uses tertian harmony. If you used quartal, micro-tone, tone rows, or set theory, the nomenclature would be different. – jjmusicnotes Apr 25 '15 at 20:27

but why is b5 favoured?

I don't know if there can be a definitive answer, but I would say that probably it's because b5 is commonly used in chord names, while #4 is not.

Being used to always call that interval b5 in the context of chords, one will naturally tend to use the same name when talking about the note itself as well.

| improve this answer | |
  • #4 is indeed not very common in chord names, but #11 is, which is simply a #4 one octave higher. So I think this argument is not convincing. – Matt L. Apr 25 '15 at 13:11
  • @MattL. - true, but it's funny we don't see b12 - or is it? – Tim Apr 25 '15 at 14:08
  • @Tim: The 5 is part of the basic triad, it can be altered (b5/#5) or not, but it's no tension. The 4 is no basic chord tone, it's always a tension, and for this reason it's usually added in a higher octave, either as a #11 for chords with a major third, or as an 11 for chords with a minor third. I guess that's the reason why we don't see a b12/#12. – Matt L. Apr 25 '15 at 14:22
  • @MattL. - and with #11 there's often the P5, an octave lower, so they don't clash. To me b5/#5 (and b9/#9) are always tension, waiting for resolution. – Tim Apr 25 '15 at 14:26
  • @Tim: Well, #9 in a I chord (Purple Haze) wouldn't need resolution, would it? Do you have an example of a P5 with #11 on top? I usually don't see this happen in practice. – Matt L. Apr 25 '15 at 14:29

Matt L.'s answer is an excellent one. If you are asking "what should I call it, and when should I call it that?" here's my experience.

In heptatonic (7 note scales) each number gets used once, you always call it a #4 if its the fourth note in the scale, e.g. in Lydian, or for a minor example, in the 4th mode of harmonic minor (essentially Dorian with a #4).

If its the fifth note of a heptatonic scale you must call it a b5. The Half Diminished scale (aka Locrian mode) is a good example. As to what to call it in the Blues scale, I see it coming down to genre more than anything else. In Rock, Blues, and Metal its always the b5. I see Jazz players, websites, and theory books calling it the sharp four more and more.

If you are in doubt and at a jam session with Jazz players, just call the note the sharp 4, with Rock or Blues guys/gals call it the flat five. With Metalheads I might call it the devil's tone, or diabolus in musica, just because its more fun to. Jazz is predominantly Major; the #4 (with no 4) gets used quite a bit because it is not dissonant against the 3 in a major chord (but the natural 4th is). There are virtually no scales in rock where you have to call it a sharp four, the only exception that comes to mind is the Double Harmonic scale (typically used for Dick Dale inspired Surf rock).

| improve this answer | |

The whole POINT of a tritone is its ambiguity!

But, in a system of harmonic analysis built on the "pile of thirds" model, I can see why a modified 5th is preferred to a modified 4th.

I find insistence that the indisputably aurally flattened b10 must be labelled #9 rather harder to take!

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I suppose that a major chord with a minor third added is pretty incongruous. – Tim Apr 25 '15 at 12:08
  • 1
    But that's what it is, at the top of the "Hendrix chord" isn't it? We don't hear a sharpened note, but a "blues" third on top of a major chord. – Laurence Payne Apr 25 '15 at 12:33
  • Good point, I almost used the #9 example. The name just sounds cooler. Would you rather date a sharp nine or a flat ten? There is no one answer. Most call it the Purple Haze chord anyway, I'll call it that when jamming with jazz or fusion guitarists ever since this one guy got so dismissive and bent out of shape over it. I don't know why but I just have to see if lightening strikes twice. – Jay Skyler Apr 25 '15 at 15:10
  • @JaySkyler: See also this answer of mine about the #9/b10 feud. – Matt L. Apr 25 '15 at 15:28
  • 1
    @Matt L. "Move to the Netherlands," that's pretty classic. Maybe I should. I could end debates with statements like "Dude, its a metric thing...you wouldn't understand." – Jay Skyler Apr 26 '15 at 1:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.