In my (pretty limited) experience, electric guitar amps seem to get heavier as they get more expensive... is this a general rule and if so, why? What makes even a relatively small amp (like a 50W $2000 Mesa) so heavy (~25kg) and how is this linked to quality?

  • 2
    Most good amps are heavy, but being heavy itself does not necessarily make it a good amp. – Tim Jun 16 '15 at 16:57
  • Are we just talking heads or are we including speaker cabs? – Neil Meyer Jun 17 '15 at 6:14
  • @NeilMeyer I was meaning the combined unit, I don't know which part the weight goes to mainly! – Mr. Boy Jun 17 '15 at 8:15

There are mainly three factors to this:

  • Powerful speakers need (or at least used to need) heavy magnets.
  • Lightweight cabinets tend to be less “acoustically stable” than heavy ones. And more easily damaged when handled roughly.
  • 50 Hz transformers need a lot of windings around fat iron cores. (Plus, tube amps also need output transformers. And, the more power you want, the more cooling you need...)

These points have gotten somewhat less relevant as technology marched on: there are now pretty light PA speakers and bass cabinets available, which use neodymium magnets and clever structural engineering to get loud levels and even sound properties. And, switching power supplies can be built much lighter than traditional transformers at the same power ratings. Class-D amplifiers need almost no cooling. And a light composite chassis can be quite as sturdy as a heavy wooden crate.


  • Guitarists have something of a tendency to avoid modern technology in favour of “vintage”, regardless if that makes any sense sound-wise
  • Guitar cab's aren't meant to sound good in the HiFi sense, but colour the sound in certain manners. Both naïvely designed light and simple heavy-duty cabs will do this, in different ways (cheap & light ones often in ways that even guitarist don't like), whereas PA speakers that are more or less trimmed for linear response just sound boring for guitar (though this can of course change when combined with a good digital cab sim).
    Similarly, non-switching power supplies (in particular with tube-diode rectifiers) have certain properties which are technically non-optimal, but actually work out positively musically.
  • 1
    You forgot transformers. I still haven't heard a solid state design that sounds as good as a tube amp, and tube amps require both power transformers and output transformers. At least in terms of output transformers, the bigger the better sounding, and those things are dense chunks of metal that therefore add a lot of weight to a tube amp. Neodymium magnets are powerful and lightweight, but just don't sound as good. AlNiCo magnets are generally preferred by most guitarists, and are also the heaviest. Sigh. – Todd Wilcox Jun 16 '15 at 12:20
  • @ToddWilcox: good point about transformers. (What you're saying about AlNiCo magnets I would, however, categorise mostly under vintage buzz... though indeed I'm also not overly fond of many modern compact designs (e.g. MarkBass amps), there are definitely many great combos with digital power stages and neodymium speakers). – leftaroundabout Jun 16 '15 at 12:30
  • I'd typed an answer covering this and then forgot to click to post it. Daft me. Therefore, I agree with all that you say - but regard lightweight guitar cabs: The better built ones, especially combo amps, are stronger, and sound better. My point being the weight of the cabinet affects the sound, as you say, but also thicker wood & tough corners / strong chassis makes the whole unit much heavier & stronger. it's true of amp heads too. Eg my 1970 marshall amp head is built like a tank .. go me! lol :-D – user2808054 Jun 16 '15 at 15:42
  • 3
    The last point is important: expensive amps presuppose gigs and if the cabinet is not well-built, it will break in the truck/trunk eventually. – Yorik Jun 16 '15 at 18:50

I used to associate quality = mass for most things, including PA systems and (tube-powered) guitar amps.

Now that I'm my 50's I've looked for ways to get that sound without so much weight, and thankfully, new neodymium magnets have helped a lot.

My current favourite is a Hughes & Kettner Combo 18. At 21 lbs it is easy on my back, but a monster for tone, and if the house needs, more they can mic it!

  • 1
    I second that. Look for a combo amplifier or speaker cabinet that uses speakers with the new neodymium magnet technology. These amps and cabinets have dramatically reduced weight compared to the "vintage" designs. There are models out there from many manufacturers that are light and portable while sounding great and having plenty of power. – user1044 Jun 17 '15 at 6:40

What makes even a relatively small amp (like a 50W $2000 Mesa) so heavy (~25kg) and how is this linked to quality?

Those amps use cast frame speakers, specifically an OEM variant of the Electro-Voice EV12L, which is probably the second loudest and second heaviest guitar speaker in the history of time (the JBL F120 is a bit louder and heavier). Heavy magnet Celestions like Vintage 30s weigh around 12-15 pounds, the EV easily weighs 25 pounds. Quality? They almost never blow out and the cast frame does not bend or warp. And they are absurdly loud at about 103 spl.

In audio gear in general the bigger and better the transformer, typically the better the sound and more reliable the amp. Black and silver face Fender Bandmasters have tiny transformers that will blow if pushed too hard, the Fender Bassmen from those eras have big transformers, are near indestructible, and give you a tight controlled low end even though they are otherwise nearly the same amp.

The transformer is the one thing that cannot be replaced or upgraded. If it is, it is no longer considered the same amp.The transformer is the engine, the tubes are the spark plugs.

electric guitar amps seem to get heavier as they get more expensive... is this a general rule and if so, why?

The reason is that larger more powerful transformers require more raw materials to produce, must be produced on higher precision tooling, and the increased weight incurs higher shipping costs both during manufacturing and when delivering the finished product.

  • Hm. Nowadays, you don't really need a transformer at all (well... switching power supplies still have HF transformers in them, but they're tiny). So I'd rather object to “the transformer is the engine”. You might say, the transformer is the carburator. (But are such analogies really useful?) – leftaroundabout Jun 21 '15 at 21:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.