I'm intruiged by the fact that some stringed instruments, like the ukulele, are traditionally tuned in the way of reentrant tuning where the strings are not ordered from the lowest to the highest pitch.

I do not play ukulele, or a similar instrument, but on first sight this seems illogical. There must be, aside from historical reasons, a good practical reason for this style of tuning. What is it?


Strings for these instruments were, historically, made from sheep gut or cow gut. In some situations it wouldn't be possible to make a thicker lower string, so a higher-octave string is substituted. In other situations there would be a point at which it isn't possible to make a thinner string that could be tuned higher. Such a string would be too weak and would break just from tuning it up to pitch. So the solution was to use a string tuned an octave lower in its place.

Reentrant tunings and strings have been used as long as there have been stringed instruments that were used to strum chords. That would take us at least back to the early 1600s with the appearance of the Baroque guitar.


The ukulele only dates from the 1880s, but it is descended from the Portuguese guitar (brought to Hawaii by Portuguese traders and colonizers) which is, in turn, descended from the Baroque guitar. The Baroque guitar used a reentrant tuning from its inception around 1646. Before that there was the lute, going back to antiquity, and also using reentrant tunings.

So one reason that the ukulele has a reentrant tuning is that it comes from a continuous line of reentrant-tuned instruments going back hundreds of years before the invention of the ukulele.

| improve this answer | |

The practical reason for reentrant tuning is to make it easier to play the chord voicings with simple chord forms (the way your fingers make the chords). Each chord voicing has a different sound and the high G string would make for a brighter sound with simple chord forms.

You can hear this in any music store that has a variety of stringed folk instruments in a variety of tunings. As you try different chord forms and scales on these instruments you'll find that the stuff that is the easiest to play tends to be the signature sound of the music that the instrument is played in.

It's for this reason that on guitar I will capo for A and D tunes. And I almost always capo for Bb and F. It's not because I don't know the closed chord forms, I do. It's that the particular voicings I'm looking for are easier to play.

| improve this answer | |
  • That's really interesting. Could you give an example? – Tim H Jul 13 '17 at 20:11
  • @TimH For example for a particular tune I may like the sound of an A chord voiced on the DGB strings at the 5th fret. The open E and A strings gives a nice open ringing sound. But I'm playing in Bb so if the other chords work I'll capo at the first fret and voice the chord on the 6th fret. – pro Jul 13 '17 at 21:41
  • @TimH Nashville tuning is another example of reentrant tuning. ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nashville_tuning_(high_strung) – pro Jul 13 '17 at 22:35

Different reasons in different instruments.

For ukeleles, it's simply that they were based on an instrument without reentrant tuning, but made in such a way whereby the lowest string could not practically be made. The instrument players wanted an instrument where the chord positions were still possible, and hey presto, you get a uke.

The ukelele was based on an instrument similar to the modern day Cavaquinho, but made with what materials were available

Some instruments were actually designed that way for a reason though, like the the 5 string banjo, which allows the whole "diddly diddly" banjo roll sound to be possible.

Without the higher pitched string available to the thumb, things like this just would not be possible

| improve this answer | |
  • can you provide a reference for this, please? – Memming Jul 17 '15 at 13:54
  • which part, the origin of the ukelele? – Some_Guy Jul 17 '15 at 17:01

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.