13

So as I was browsing the forum, I saw many posts about voices in piano, and how you should play them all at the same time. I really don't get when a voice exists in a song, and how I should I play it. For example, in this piece from Chopin, Winter wind, it says that this

enter image description here

Should be played like this.

enter image description here

How can I recognize these patterns in my every day music, and how are they supposed to be played?

16
+50

First, I don't agree with that interpretation personally (if that's what Chopin had wanted, he would have written it that way, meticulous soul that he was), so I wouldn't put too much stock in how something "should" be played. In this etude, the voices are this flying passage and the melody in the bass. Breaking it up further is artificial-sounding. That's my opinion, and it's no better or worse than the writer's. In other words, what you SHOULD do is make up your own mind. :)

As for what a "voice" is on the piano: voices are just different lines of music played together. This is rigorous in, say, a fugue; a fugue has three or four voices (usually three or four, but sometimes more; five voices isn't all that uncommon) that all run along simultaneously. This version of Bach's first two-part invention (sort of like a fugue with two voices) will illustrate the concept clearly:

Now, once you get past the baroque period, the idea of voices is still there, but more loosely applied. Here's Brahms' Intermezzo Op. 118 No. 2. Have a look at the F# minor section at 1:50. You will see that there are three distinct voices, three distinct musical parts, going on simultaneously. You will also see that Brahms went to considerable trouble to notate the middle (or "inner") voice in such a way that it didn't get lost in the lower voice, even though the lower voice has a lot of the same notes. That's why a lot of the notes have both upward quarter note stems and downward eighth note stems.

Contrast that with the più lento section that begins at 2:29. There's an obvious melody in the top note of each chord, and the rest of the notes are obviously harmonizing chords, so the obvious way to play it (which is not to say the only way to play it) is to bring out the top note in each chord, and let the other notes enrich the melody as a harmonic accompaniment.

So, the composer will give you clues about his intentions with bringing out inner voices, and Brahms was particularly meticulous about this as was Chopin. But also, what you are "supposed" to do is interpret the composer. That means that your performance is a partnership between you and the composer, not a rendering of the music as the composer would play it. You can look for less-than-obvious melodic lines in music, and if you think they express your musical feelings, then that's what you play.

We can go back to Chopin to illustrate this. Here is a performance of his Nocturne No. 9 in Bb. Look at how Rubinstein treats the inner voices; for the most part they are subjugated to the main melody. When he does bring out an inner voice, it's only in small areas, and when it was written that way. An example is at 1:18, the measure just past the one marked "D" in the score.

Now, here's another performance, with an animated score. (I wouldn't personally separate the music this rigorously into voices, but it's one of the requirements of an animated score. Some of the different-colored voices are meant to run together.) You'll notice that Malinowski puts much more emphasis on the inner and bass voices than Rubinstein does (and interestingly, he downplays the inner voice at the point I mentioned in the Rubinstein performance).

So, as you can see, voicing, like phrasing and to a lesser extent dynamics, is very much open to personal interpretation. If someone tells you that you are "supposed" to do it in a particular way, I would take that with a grain of salt. Guidelines rather than rules.

  • 1
    Everyone uses them. However, some styles are more rigorous than others about distinguishing different voices. Polyphony is the term for multiple voices running together, homophony is a term for one voice with accompanying harmony. In the Baroque era, polyphony was primary. You would notice that the German composers, of whom Bach is the greatest example, use it more obviously than Italian composers such as Vivaldi. (cont) – BobRodes Nov 23 '15 at 4:55
  • 1
    Homophony is pretty accurately characterized as "melody with accompaniment." You will see that more often in Classical and Romantic music, with polyphony used sort of as a form of musical decoration. The Brahms is a good example of that. It starts out with a melody and accompaniment. While the accompaniment has some rhythmic interest of its own, the melody is the part you would sing at someone if you were singing the piece at them. On the other hand, that middle section has a couple of voices of equal importance, weaving in and out of each other. So, the melody is always one voice. – BobRodes Nov 23 '15 at 4:58
  • Sorry for adding and deleeting comments. So you wouldn't play the second interpretation any differently? What about when there is a comma above a note. Doesn't that mean that it is played diffently? – Michael Nov 23 '15 at 5:00
  • 1
    I would play it as written. :) While there is a sense of the first and third 16th notes in each group of four functioning as a melody in their own right, this happens naturally because of the shape of the notes and shouldn't be overemphasized. Here's one example of a performance with the music: youtube.com/watch?v=YJMIIxm1bGo . Now, for a counterexample, if you look at the "Ocean" etude here: youtube.com/watch?v=5M2PO4f5Y7k you'll see plenty of examples of a melody of quarter notes in the 16th notes. But Chopin wrote it that way. – BobRodes Nov 23 '15 at 5:05
  • @BobRodes, homophony was essentially a Baroque invention. Have a listen to very nearly any of Monteverdi's operas - the addition of homophonic arias is what made them so very different from Renaissance vocal art, and that was the very beginning of the period. – user16935 Nov 23 '15 at 8:24
3

"Voicing" in piano is a common term among pianists. Maybe that is the term, and concept, you want to understand.

This term has to do with which notes stick out more, i.e. which are more prominent. Which ones you want the listener to notice more.

A simple example is, suppose you have a simple melody in the right hand, and a simple arpeggiated accompaniment in the left hand. A beginning pianist might tend to play both hands at the same dynamic, or volume, level.

A more experienced pianist might decide that the melody is more important, and should be brought out more; and that the left hand accompaniment should be more in the background.

What that more experience player is doing constitutes a simple example of voicing.

  • So you apply different effects to each voice I thought you should always stick to the sheet music. – Michael Dec 7 '15 at 1:17
  • @Michael - "Different effects"? Not sure how you understood this. I apologize if I wasn't clear. I'm talking about making subtle shading adjustments in the balance between, for example, the left hand and the right hand, to bring out the more important parts. – aparente001 Dec 7 '15 at 2:18
1

It's helpful to think of singers when thinking about voicing; singers can only sing one note at a time- you can think of a "voice" in the piano music as the series of notes that belong to a particular "singer." Just like in a chorus, singers can be singing many different melodic lines, as can a piano piece- there can be many different "lines" or "voices." In the second Winter Wind above, the interpretation is saying that every eighth note is part of one voice, and you should imagine the sixteenth notes as part of the other voice. You should think of these notes in their respective groups, and there will always be a hierarchy of which "group" is more important. In this case, it would be the eighth notes that you would want to emphasize.

As noted before, Bach's Preludes and Fugues in particular are great (and obvious) examples of different voices in piano music.

To recognize these different voices, mostly one relies on music notation or historical interpretations (as we hear in recordings or edited editions). How they are supposed to be play, well.. that really depends on the context- sorry to be vague.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.