Historically, the AFM was the place to be to get anything done with music performance; or so that's what I heard growing up. But I don't hear much about it now. This was even the case while I was working on my undergraduate degree in music performance surrounded by professional performers.

I understand it provided some benefits, and protection like all unions, but in this privatized day and age, is it still worthwhile to have an affiliation with a musician's union? Do they offer benefits you simply can not receive without affiliation?

Are people being refused service because of being in one? Not being in one?

I purely want to see what benefits (or lack thereof) they offer to performing musicians.

  • How can this be opinion based when I've only stated I'm looking at facts and literal benefits of being/not being in the union? As a union, their white sheets are quite evident and plenty of perks can be addressed in certain. – user6164 Jan 21 '16 at 15:21
  • Real-world cases with real musicians can assert these perks or refute them without opinion. – user6164 Jan 21 '16 at 15:27
  • 4
    This is an interesting question, but it seems really broad to me. Should a rock band guitarist join a union? A famous soloist? A back-row violinist? The benefits to one will be worthless to another. – Josiah Jan 21 '16 at 16:39
  • 1
    I would guess any benefits would simply be member benefits they offer. I know that many clubs and bars don't want to hire musicians that are members of PRO's because they don't want to pay the PRO's. So in some cases being a member of certain organizations who purport to protect your rights (so they can make a profit) may actually close doors for you as a performing musician. Join the union and get the t-shirt - but don't tell anyone you are a member. That's just my opinion. – Rockin Cowboy Jan 21 '16 at 21:09
  • 1
    What do you mean by “this privatized age?” If that has a meaning, please explain it with examples. If it is meaningless, please edit it out. “The modern day” is also essentially meaningless without explanation and examples. – Simon White Jan 27 '16 at 23:27

My essential list of organisations to belong to as a musician in the UK includes the PRS and PPL in order to be paid royalties (like ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC in the US) and the Musician's Union for the following:

  • Instrument insurance as Tim mentioned
  • £1million public liability insurance (quite important to a band with pyro...)
  • legal and contract advice
  • free hearing tests
  • free music industry seminars
  • free general guidance

And various other benefits including networking opportunities. I would assume the equivalent unions in other countries would offer similar.


Don't know about other countries, but in U.K. there's the Musicians' Union. As a member, I was entitled to £2,000 of instrument insurance, topped up if necessary, which was a nice thing to have. The M.U. habitually chased up promoters who still owed money for performances, and warned against bad promoters. On occasions, I could get a pro-forma for contracts for gigs. Some gigs needed all band players to be members, work for t.v., etc. A minimum fee was stipulated - but for 'ordinary' gigs, often undercut. Membership was free for those in full time education. An amount, £1000 I think, was available towards funeral costs for paid up members. Something to die for!


In the USA, orchestra musicians belong to the American Federation of Musicians as a matter of course. The AFM is location-based and oriented towards professionals such as studio, show and classical musicians. Other musicians can join AFM Local 1000. Check out the website for the benefits.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy