My question is simple:

Do bindings around the neck or body of a guitar play any role in the sound that the instrument produces?

4 Answers 4


Binding, for both bodies and necks, is primarily to provide sacrificial material for minor dings and dents, which is why it's placed on edges and occasionally on the sides of fretboards.

Fretboard binding has the added bonus of preventing or at least hiding the edges of frets from sticking out and making fretting uncomfortable. Sometimes frets are poorly installed or more likely the fretboard wood shrinks slightly as it dries out which can make the frets stick out. The biggest problem with fretboard binding is that it can make refretting the guitar more difficult and more expensive.

Binding can be removed and replaced much more easily than the wood that it protects, which is why it exists. It also can look darn good when done right. As binding is not structural and makes up a very small portion of the mass of any guitar that has it, I'd be surprised if it had much of a noticeable effect on sound. Maybe some people who can hear (or claim to hear) different battery voltages in their tube screamer pedals (cough, Eric Johnson, cough) might have a sensitivity to a sound difference between bound and unbound, but I've never heard of such a distinction.

Personally I prefer bound bodies and unbound fretboards, most of the time.


On acoustic guitars the body binding is very much part of the construction so in that sense they make a difference to the sound in that the guitar would not be a guitar without them. Neck binding on all guitars and body binding on all guitars is a decorative feature. There's an ongoing war about how much difference (if any) wood makes to the sound of electric guitars, so I won't claim that binding has absolutely zero effect, but I would say it is of no great significance. To my ears Les Paul standards don't sound much different to Les Paul studios (I would likely fail a blind test). Standard have the binding and are all round more blingy whilst studios are more no-frill workhorses.

  • I never knew there was dispute about electric guitar wood and its effect on tone. Can't the warring parties simply compare an ash telecaster to an alder one of the same construction and prove to all concerned that it matters? I consider it totally obvious that wood matters. Huh. Commented Feb 19, 2016 at 12:10
  • 3
    There certainly is on YouTube. One guy on there swapped the bodies on a strat with between the standard alder and Perspex and played a number of samples of each, shuffled the order and played them to the audience guitar unseen, and asked people to guess which was which. When I listened I really thought I could tell which was which, but when compared to the correct answer, most people, myself included scored no better than flipping a coin. Die-hard wood matters proponents claimed various flaws in the test, mainly youtube sound quality. Commented Feb 19, 2016 at 12:30
  • I'm surprised both sides didn't point out YouTube sound quality, since a bad test helps no one on either side. Also I find the plastic pick guard dominates the strat sound which is why I suggested Tele. I really don't care if people think wood doesn't matter. I know when I go to buy a guitar that there's a different feel and sound and it's not like in the electric world some woods are hideously expensive (at least none of the ones I care about). Commented Feb 19, 2016 at 12:46
  • To clarify things, nobody seems to be debating whether wood makes a difference to the unamplified sound, only the amplified sound. I think the test was about as fair as you can get but has limitations. I'm on the fence but leaning towards the idea that people have a psychological bias to believe tonewoods make a major difference because that's what makers have always said and people want to believe that their expensive guitar was worth every penny. With more evidence I could be persuaded that any difference is imperceptible. check out youtube.com/watch?v=5vgwaiScrwA Commented Feb 19, 2016 at 14:37

First off, Todd Wilcox is a bit "off" on his answer. His tonewood comparison between a Les Paul Standard and Studio is quite amusing, considering both have mahogany bodies with maple caps. Everyone would be hard pressed to tell the difference.

Now, YES--type of wood makes a huge difference in tone! Hell, even different fretboard woods produce noticeably different tones. Problem is, most people that try to "compare" tonewoods go about it all wrong--they use an amp. Try comparing without plugging in. Yep, now you can hear it.

  • This is a comment, rather than an answer.
    – Tim
    Commented Oct 3, 2016 at 6:54
  • 1
    "Now, YES--type of wood makes a huge difference in tone! Hell, even different fretboard woods produce noticeably different tones." A matter of personal opinion rather than something that can be demonstrated with reliable results.
    – ABragg
    Commented Oct 3, 2016 at 15:41
  • 1
    What good is difference in tone that you can't hear through an amp? Commented Jun 23, 2017 at 23:37

To answer the question in the title 'Why some instruments have binding around the neck and/or body while some do not?', the answer comes down to money! Focussing only on electric guitars for the time being, it takes more skill and additional time to route the channels needed to bind a body or neck. In the case of a bound neck, it takes additional skill to produce binding 'nibs', which are the small binding caps that sit over the ends of the frets. Gibson, for example, only bound the Les Paul line from the 'standard' up, leaving the les Paul junior (and Melody Maker variants) with neither a bound neck or body. Fender didn't adopt binding until the '60s, with some Telecaster bodies being bound, alongside Jazzmaster necks, the very occasional Stratocaster neck here and there, the neck of the Jazz bass (though these weren't bound for the first few years of production) and a few of the CBS-era designs. Again this represented an additional manufacturing step, which was represented in the cost of the instrument passed over to the consumer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.